Segmenting scaffolds with ingrown bone in micro-CT images: considerations of evaluation metrics and loss functions

U-Net models are useful for biomedical image segmentation because they do not require large training sets. Here, we trained three U-Net models, each with a different loss function, to segment micro-CT image patches of scaffolds with ingrown bone to quantify bone growth fraction. Segmentation performance is typically reported using metrics like Accuracy, DSC, Precision, and Recall. However, these metrics did not reflect performance relative to the application’s key output measure. We therefore aimed to establish an application-specific parameter, ΔBGF: the difference in bone growth fraction (BGF) between predicted output (PO) and ground truth (GT). Bland–Altman analysis showed small systematic bias (< 1.5 percentage points), supporting PO-GT agreement. Accuracy was the metric most strongly correlated to |ΔBGF| in nearly all comparisons (Steiger test), and this relationship was stable under bootstrap resampling. The models were robust to changes in orientation, resolution, and contrast, supporting broader generalizability. The cross-entropy loss model generated the most reliable segmentation. PO-GT error was small relative to meaningful biological differences, suggesting it is unlikely to affect future treatment comparisons. Overall, standard metrics can be misleading, while ΔBGF provides a reliable, application-specific measure of performance for this still developing use of U-Net in quantifying bone regeneration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-026-03686-x
Primary Topic
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Segmenting scaffolds with ingrown bone in micro-CT images: considerations of evaluation metrics and loss functions

Arthur R. C. McCray, Amy J. Wagoner Johnson, Heidi Phillips, Julián A. Norato et al.
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
article

Segmenting scaffolds with ingrown bone in micro-CT images: considerations of evaluation metrics and loss functions

Arthur R. C. McCray, Amy J. Wagoner Johnson, Heidi Phillips, Julián A. Norato, David Cohen, Sohaila Aboutaleb, Nellie Haug, Prachi Keni-McCray, Stephanie Sharping
article en

Abstract

U-Net models are useful for biomedical image segmentation because they do not require large training sets. Here, we trained three U-Net models, each with a different loss function, to segment micro-CT image patches of scaffolds with ingrown bone to quantify bone growth fraction. Segmentation performance is typically reported using metrics like Accuracy, DSC, Precision, and Recall. However, these metrics did not reflect performance relative to the application’s key output measure. We therefore aimed to establish an application-specific parameter, ΔBGF: the difference in bone growth fraction (BGF) between predicted output (PO) and ground truth (GT). Bland–Altman analysis showed small systematic bias (< 1.5 percentage points), supporting PO-GT agreement. Accuracy was the metric most strongly correlated to |ΔBGF| in nearly all comparisons (Steiger test), and this relationship was stable under bootstrap resampling. The models were robust to changes in orientation, resolution, and contrast, supporting broader generalizability. The cross-entropy loss model generated the most reliable segmentation. PO-GT error was small relative to meaningful biological differences, suggesting it is unlikely to affect future treatment comparisons. Overall, standard metrics can be misleading, while ΔBGF provides a reliable, application-specific measure of performance for this still developing use of U-Net in quantifying bone regeneration.

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
University of Connecticut (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Chicago, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.