Comparative energy justice scholarship: Toward an empirical research agenda

Drawing on our collective experiences conducting empirical research on the energy transition from fossil fuels to clean energy in select democracies in North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia, we propose a rich empirical approach that focuses on in-depth qualitative analysis to create a Comparative Energy Justice research agenda. The energy transition makes room for a more as well as less just system to emerge. Focusing on the energy transition rather than the broader category of energy allows us to center this interaction and provide insights for those advocating for greater energy justice. Each section summarizes findings and concludes with suggestions for comparative research. We first discuss political institutional structures related to energy policy that have been under-explored in energy justice research, notably federalism, public utility commissions, and Indigenous Nations governance. Next, we elaborate five categories of under-researched actors in the energy transition: the European Union's Local Action Groups, social justice organizations, businesses and political conservatives, faith-based organizations, and workers in the energy transition. Research should explore how these actors have interacted and will interact in the future with older coalition members who might have different experiences and world views. Moving beyond extant research that focuses on concepts and theoretical framing, our research agenda seeks to understand what is happening on the ground, for key constituencies including workers, advocates, policymakers, and citizens. We are ultimately concerned with understanding how groups and individuals experience and advocate for justice in the energy transition as well as the potential pitfalls of broadening pro-renewable energy coalitions that might split over justice issues. Our focus on under-explored institutions and actors in the overlapping space of the energy transition, energy justice, and comparative research is a novel approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.105018
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative energy justice scholarship: Toward an empirical research agenda

Alexandra Mallett, Frank N. Laird, Kathleen J. Hancock, Kathryn Chelminski et al.
Energy Research & Social Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Comparative energy justice scholarship: Toward an empirical research agenda

Alexandra Mallett, Frank N. Laird, Kathleen J. Hancock, Kathryn Chelminski, Suyash Jolly, Christina E. Hoicka
article en

Abstract

Drawing on our collective experiences conducting empirical research on the energy transition from fossil fuels to clean energy in select democracies in North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia, we propose a rich empirical approach that focuses on in-depth qualitative analysis to create a Comparative Energy Justice research agenda. The energy transition makes room for a more as well as less just system to emerge. Focusing on the energy transition rather than the broader category of energy allows us to center this interaction and provide insights for those advocating for greater energy justice. Each section summarizes findings and concludes with suggestions for comparative research. We first discuss political institutional structures related to energy policy that have been under-explored in energy justice research, notably federalism, public utility commissions, and Indigenous Nations governance. Next, we elaborate five categories of under-researched actors in the energy transition: the European Union's Local Action Groups, social justice organizations, businesses and political conservatives, faith-based organizations, and workers in the energy transition. Research should explore how these actors have interacted and will interact in the future with older coalition members who might have different experiences and world views. Moving beyond extant research that focuses on concepts and theoretical framing, our research agenda seeks to understand what is happening on the ground, for key constituencies including workers, advocates, policymakers, and citizens. We are ultimately concerned with understanding how groups and individuals experience and advocate for justice in the energy transition as well as the potential pitfalls of broadening pro-renewable energy coalitions that might split over justice issues. Our focus on under-explored institutions and actors in the overlapping space of the energy transition, energy justice, and comparative research is a novel approach.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 141
University of Denver (US), Colorado School of Mines (US), University of Ostrava (CZ), University of Victoria (CA), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.