Preoperative and early postoperative predictors of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic abdominal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent, distressing complication of laparoscopic abdominal surgery, yet widely used risk scores such as the Apfel score predate enhanced recovery (ERAS) practice and do not capture perioperative management. In a prospective cohort study at a single tertiary centre, we characterised PONV, temporally tested a modified Apfel score, and quantified potentially modifiable postoperative exposures. A development cohort ( n = 315; August–December 2023) and a temporally independent validation cohort ( n = 64; February–March 2025) were assessed for PONV within 24 h, which occurred in 17.5% (55/315) and 23.4% (15/64), respectively. Because 24-h tramadol and early oral intake are postoperative exposures that may be influenced by the outcome, the prediction model was fixed at a landmark (post-anaesthesia care unit discharge) using only information available at that point: history of motion sickness, smoking, postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and surgical site. Motion sickness was an independent risk factor (odds ratio 4.90) and current smoking was protective (0.40); PCA and surgical site were not independently significant. Discrimination was moderate (area under the curve 0.789 development, 0.832 validation; optimism-corrected C-statistic 0.776), and calibration point estimates suggested under-prediction in the higher-incidence validation cohort (observed-to-expected ratio 1.31, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.18). The model discriminated better than a modified Apfel score in development (ΔAUC + 0.039, p = 0.003) but not in validation (ΔAUC − 0.014, p = 0.49). In a separate exploratory analysis, the apparent protective effect of early oral intake weakened substantially under a time-ordered landmark analysis, consistent with reverse causation. These findings identify modifiable perioperative exposures as hypothesis-generating targets rather than establishing a superior prediction tool, and require multicentre external validation before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-73491-x
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative and early postoperative predictors of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic abdominal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme

Haojun Huang, Hong Lin, Guixing Lin, Muming Xu et al.
Scientific Reports
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Preoperative and early postoperative predictors of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic abdominal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme

Haojun Huang, Hong Lin, Guixing Lin, Muming Xu, Haokai Hu, Kaida Chen, Jinpeng Yuan
article en

Abstract

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent, distressing complication of laparoscopic abdominal surgery, yet widely used risk scores such as the Apfel score predate enhanced recovery (ERAS) practice and do not capture perioperative management. In a prospective cohort study at a single tertiary centre, we characterised PONV, temporally tested a modified Apfel score, and quantified potentially modifiable postoperative exposures. A development cohort ( n = 315; August–December 2023) and a temporally independent validation cohort ( n = 64; February–March 2025) were assessed for PONV within 24 h, which occurred in 17.5% (55/315) and 23.4% (15/64), respectively. Because 24-h tramadol and early oral intake are postoperative exposures that may be influenced by the outcome, the prediction model was fixed at a landmark (post-anaesthesia care unit discharge) using only information available at that point: history of motion sickness, smoking, postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and surgical site. Motion sickness was an independent risk factor (odds ratio 4.90) and current smoking was protective (0.40); PCA and surgical site were not independently significant. Discrimination was moderate (area under the curve 0.789 development, 0.832 validation; optimism-corrected C-statistic 0.776), and calibration point estimates suggested under-prediction in the higher-incidence validation cohort (observed-to-expected ratio 1.31, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.18). The model discriminated better than a modified Apfel score in development (ΔAUC + 0.039, p = 0.003) but not in validation (ΔAUC − 0.014, p = 0.49). In a separate exploratory analysis, the apparent protective effect of early oral intake weakened substantially under a time-ordered landmark analysis, consistent with reverse causation. These findings identify modifiable perioperative exposures as hypothesis-generating targets rather than establishing a superior prediction tool, and require multicentre external validation before clinical use.

Scientific Reports
Shantou University (CN), Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.