Family-Centered Care and Outcomes of Child Flourishing and Family Resilience and Connection

Importance Family-centered care is an approach to pediatric health care that recognizes the essential role of the family in ensuring child health and well-being, seeks to establish collaborative partnerships among the child, family, and health care team, and provides a framework for implementing trauma-informed care. However, the association between receiving family-centered care and key measures of child and family well-being, including among families with a history of trauma and adversity, is unknown. Objectives To examine associations between family-centered care and child flourishing and family resilience and connection among US children and to assess whether associations differ by the child’s history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used 2021 to 2024 National Survey of Children’s Health data from children aged 6 to 17 years. Analyses were conducted in September to December 2025. Exposure Caregiver report of receipt of family-centered care by the child’s physician or other health care practitioners in the past 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Child flourishing and family resilience and connection based on caregiver response to established measures. Results This study assessed 110 984 children (mean [SD] age, 11.5 [0.02], years; 57 302 [51.0%] male and 53 682 [49.0%] female) who had a health care visit in the past 12 months. Adjusted for potential confounders, the prevalence of child flourishing was 8.6 percentage points higher (prevalence difference [PD], 0.086; 95% CI, 0.072-0.101), and the prevalence of family resilience and connection was 8.2 percentage points higher (PD, 0.082; 95% CI, 0.069-0.096) for those who received family-centered care compared with those who did not. Among children with and without ACEs, the prevalence of child flourishing (with ACES: PD, 0.112; 95% CI, 0.089-0.132; without ACEs: PD, 0.068; 95% CI, 0.049-0.087) and family resilience and connection (with ACEs: PD, 0.105; 95% CI, 0.085-0.125; without ACEs: PD, 0.0563; 95% CI, 0.043-0.081) was higher for those who received family-centered care compared with those who did not, with larger estimates among children with ACEs than children without ACEs. Conclusions and Relevance Results from this cross-sectional study found that family-centered care was associated with a higher prevalence of child flourishing and family resilience and connection, particularly among those with a history of adversity. These results suggest that family-centered care offers a practical and measurable way for health care professionals to promote well-being for all children and families but particularly for children with a history of ACEs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.31265
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family-Centered Care and Outcomes of Child Flourishing and Family Resilience and Connection

Anna E. Austin, Christine Katie Thang, Sasha S. Svendsen
JAMA Network Open
Child and Adolescent Health
article

Family-Centered Care and Outcomes of Child Flourishing and Family Resilience and Connection

Anna E. Austin, Christine Katie Thang, Sasha S. Svendsen
article en

Abstract

Importance Family-centered care is an approach to pediatric health care that recognizes the essential role of the family in ensuring child health and well-being, seeks to establish collaborative partnerships among the child, family, and health care team, and provides a framework for implementing trauma-informed care. However, the association between receiving family-centered care and key measures of child and family well-being, including among families with a history of trauma and adversity, is unknown. Objectives To examine associations between family-centered care and child flourishing and family resilience and connection among US children and to assess whether associations differ by the child’s history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used 2021 to 2024 National Survey of Children’s Health data from children aged 6 to 17 years. Analyses were conducted in September to December 2025. Exposure Caregiver report of receipt of family-centered care by the child’s physician or other health care practitioners in the past 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Child flourishing and family resilience and connection based on caregiver response to established measures. Results This study assessed 110 984 children (mean [SD] age, 11.5 [0.02], years; 57 302 [51.0%] male and 53 682 [49.0%] female) who had a health care visit in the past 12 months. Adjusted for potential confounders, the prevalence of child flourishing was 8.6 percentage points higher (prevalence difference [PD], 0.086; 95% CI, 0.072-0.101), and the prevalence of family resilience and connection was 8.2 percentage points higher (PD, 0.082; 95% CI, 0.069-0.096) for those who received family-centered care compared with those who did not. Among children with and without ACEs, the prevalence of child flourishing (with ACES: PD, 0.112; 95% CI, 0.089-0.132; without ACEs: PD, 0.068; 95% CI, 0.049-0.087) and family resilience and connection (with ACEs: PD, 0.105; 95% CI, 0.085-0.125; without ACEs: PD, 0.0563; 95% CI, 0.043-0.081) was higher for those who received family-centered care compared with those who did not, with larger estimates among children with ACEs than children without ACEs. Conclusions and Relevance Results from this cross-sectional study found that family-centered care was associated with a higher prevalence of child flourishing and family resilience and connection, particularly among those with a history of adversity. These results suggest that family-centered care offers a practical and measurable way for health care professionals to promote well-being for all children and families but particularly for children with a history of ACEs.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(10)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Child and Adolescent Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.