Multi-dimensional evaluation framework for electric vehicle battery recycling

Developing sustainable battery lifecycle management strategies for the rapidly expanding electric vehicle sector is essential to improve the sustainability and resilience of battery supply chains. To support strategic decision-making under uncertainty, this study proposes a q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS)-based Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) framework for the comprehensive evaluation of battery recycling methods. A multi-criteria decision-making model was developed by identifying ten sub-criteria grouped under the three main dimensions of technological requirements, sustainability, and productivity through an extensive literature review and expert evaluations. Using this framework, seven battery recycling methods were assessed and ranked according to their overall performance. To validate the robustness and reliability of the proposed approach, comparative analyses with other fuzzy MCDM methods, q-level analyses, and sensitivity analyses of the criteria weights were conducted. The results indicate that hydrometallurgy is the most suitable recycling method, followed by direct regeneration, whereas mechanochemistry ranks as the least preferred alternative. The proposed q-ROFS-based CODAS framework effectively captures uncertainty, accommodates variations in expert judgments, and considers the interactions among evaluation criteria, providing a robust and reliable decision-support tool for sustainable battery recycling policy selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2026.124945
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-dimensional evaluation framework for electric vehicle battery recycling

Hakan Ayhan Dağıstanlı, Nadir Yılmaz, Alpaslan Atmanlı
Journal of Energy Storage
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Multi-dimensional evaluation framework for electric vehicle battery recycling

Hakan Ayhan Dağıstanlı, Nadir Yılmaz, Alpaslan Atmanlı
article en

Abstract

Developing sustainable battery lifecycle management strategies for the rapidly expanding electric vehicle sector is essential to improve the sustainability and resilience of battery supply chains. To support strategic decision-making under uncertainty, this study proposes a q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS)-based Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) framework for the comprehensive evaluation of battery recycling methods. A multi-criteria decision-making model was developed by identifying ten sub-criteria grouped under the three main dimensions of technological requirements, sustainability, and productivity through an extensive literature review and expert evaluations. Using this framework, seven battery recycling methods were assessed and ranked according to their overall performance. To validate the robustness and reliability of the proposed approach, comparative analyses with other fuzzy MCDM methods, q-level analyses, and sensitivity analyses of the criteria weights were conducted. The results indicate that hydrometallurgy is the most suitable recycling method, followed by direct regeneration, whereas mechanochemistry ranks as the least preferred alternative. The proposed q-ROFS-based CODAS framework effectively captures uncertainty, accommodates variations in expert judgments, and considers the interactions among evaluation criteria, providing a robust and reliable decision-support tool for sustainable battery recycling policy selection.

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 182
Çankaya University (TR), Howard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.