With whom and how: policy learning during critical junctures in Euro-Mediterranean relations

Structural power asymmetries and policy-learning dynamics shape the European Union’s choices of partners and cooperation formats in Euro-Mediterranean relations. The article traces these dynamics across five critical junctures, moments when accumulated experience and actor constellations may enable foreign policy change: the post–Cold War period, 9/11, the 2004 enlargement, the Arab uprisings and the post-2020 “permacrisis”. Based on process tracing, document analysis and elite interviews, the findings show that crises tend to generate first- and second-order change (e.g. new instruments), while core assumptions regarding geography, hierarchy and governance remain stable. EU-centred institutional templates, differentiation logics and limited power-sharing with partner governments and societal actors mean the EU consistently treats its own prior experience as the template for cooperation, producing selective learning that is more often exported to partners than developed jointly with them. As a result, learning is cumulative but rarely transformative, reinforcing continuity in both the spatial boundaries and hierarchical structure of Euro-Mediterranean cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Politics
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-026-00820-2
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

With whom and how: policy learning during critical junctures in Euro-Mediterranean relations

Eduard Soler i Lecha
International Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
article

With whom and how: policy learning during critical junctures in Euro-Mediterranean relations

Eduard Soler i Lecha
article en

Abstract

Structural power asymmetries and policy-learning dynamics shape the European Union’s choices of partners and cooperation formats in Euro-Mediterranean relations. The article traces these dynamics across five critical junctures, moments when accumulated experience and actor constellations may enable foreign policy change: the post–Cold War period, 9/11, the 2004 enlargement, the Arab uprisings and the post-2020 “permacrisis”. Based on process tracing, document analysis and elite interviews, the findings show that crises tend to generate first- and second-order change (e.g. new instruments), while core assumptions regarding geography, hierarchy and governance remain stable. EU-centred institutional templates, differentiation logics and limited power-sharing with partner governments and societal actors mean the EU consistently treats its own prior experience as the template for cooperation, producing selective learning that is more often exported to partners than developed jointly with them. As a result, learning is cumulative but rarely transformative, reinforcing continuity in both the spatial boundaries and hierarchical structure of Euro-Mediterranean cooperation.

International Politics
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

With whom and how: policy learning during critical junctures in Euro-Mediterranean relations — Eduard Soler i Lecha · International Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS