Relationship between Silvopastoral Cover and Enteric Methane Footprint in Tropical Cattle Farms of the Ecuadorian Amazon

Cattle farming in the Ecuadorian Amazon contributes substantially to enteric methane emissions, yet farm-level evidence on the role of silvopastoral systems (SPSs) in mitigating emissions remains limited. This study evaluated the relationship between SPS cover, stocking rate, and the enteric CH4 carbon footprint in 86 cattle farms in Zamora Chinchipe, Ecuador. Farms were classified according to SPS cover as low (0–10%), medium (11–30%), or high (>30%). Enteric CH4 emissions were estimated using IPCC (2019) emission factors and expressed as an area-based enteric methane footprint (kg CO2e ha−1 year−1) and a product-based enteric methane footprint (kg CO2e L−1 of milk). Stocking rate tended to decrease with increasing SPS cover, but differences among SPS categories were not statistically significant (p = 0.084). In contrast, the area-based enteric methane footprint differed significantly among SPS categories (p = 0.008). Tukey-adjusted comparisons showed that low-SPS farms had a higher area-based enteric methane footprint than medium-SPS (adjusted p = 0.028) and high-SPS farms (adjusted p = 0.049), whereas medium- and high-SPS farms did not differ significantly (adjusted p = 0.795). The product-based enteric methane footprint did not differ significantly among SPS categories (p = 0.225). In the multivariable model, greater SPS cover remained negatively associated with the area-based enteric methane footprint (regression coefficient = −27.66 kg CO2e ha−1 yr−1 per percentage point of SPS cover, p = 0.015). These findings indicate that greater SPS cover was associated with a lower enteric methane footprint at the territorial scale, whereas the corresponding difference in the product-based indicator was not statistically significant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16192146
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship between Silvopastoral Cover and Enteric Methane Footprint in Tropical Cattle Farms of the Ecuadorian Amazon

Daniel Capa-Mora, Natacha Del Cisne Fierro Jaramillo, Leticia Jiménez, Rubén Carrera Durazno
Agriculture
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Relationship between Silvopastoral Cover and Enteric Methane Footprint in Tropical Cattle Farms of the Ecuadorian Amazon

Daniel Capa-Mora, Natacha Del Cisne Fierro Jaramillo, Leticia Jiménez, Rubén Carrera Durazno
article en

Abstract

Cattle farming in the Ecuadorian Amazon contributes substantially to enteric methane emissions, yet farm-level evidence on the role of silvopastoral systems (SPSs) in mitigating emissions remains limited. This study evaluated the relationship between SPS cover, stocking rate, and the enteric CH4 carbon footprint in 86 cattle farms in Zamora Chinchipe, Ecuador. Farms were classified according to SPS cover as low (0–10%), medium (11–30%), or high (>30%). Enteric CH4 emissions were estimated using IPCC (2019) emission factors and expressed as an area-based enteric methane footprint (kg CO2e ha−1 year−1) and a product-based enteric methane footprint (kg CO2e L−1 of milk). Stocking rate tended to decrease with increasing SPS cover, but differences among SPS categories were not statistically significant (p = 0.084). In contrast, the area-based enteric methane footprint differed significantly among SPS categories (p = 0.008). Tukey-adjusted comparisons showed that low-SPS farms had a higher area-based enteric methane footprint than medium-SPS (adjusted p = 0.028) and high-SPS farms (adjusted p = 0.049), whereas medium- and high-SPS farms did not differ significantly (adjusted p = 0.795). The product-based enteric methane footprint did not differ significantly among SPS categories (p = 0.225). In the multivariable model, greater SPS cover remained negatively associated with the area-based enteric methane footprint (regression coefficient = −27.66 kg CO2e ha−1 yr−1 per percentage point of SPS cover, p = 0.015). These findings indicate that greater SPS cover was associated with a lower enteric methane footprint at the territorial scale, whereas the corresponding difference in the product-based indicator was not statistically significant.

AgricultureVol. 16(19)
Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relationship between Silvopastoral Cover and Enteric Methane Footprint in Tropical Cattle Farms of the Ecuadorian Amazon — Daniel Capa-Mora, Natacha Del Cisne Fierro Jaramillo, et al. · Agriculture (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS