Radiant Revive AI Equity Audit: Methods Document, Version 1.1 (RR-STEM v1.1)

Versioned public methods document for the Radiant Revive AI Equity Audit, an independent statistical audit of how dermatology AI models perform across skin tones (engine release RR-STEM v1.1). It fixes in advance what the audit measures, how it measures it, what counts as a finding, and how findings are judged, so that nothing is chosen after a client's data has been opened. Contents: inputs and pre-processing (fingerprinting, validation, deduplication); two primary endpoints (sensitivity disparity between the lightest and darkest reportable Fitzpatrick bands, and an ordered trend in sensitivity across tone levels) with a Bonferroni family-wise policy; secondary endpoints; operating-point rule; interval methods (Wilson, Newcombe hybrid score, patient-resampled bootstrap, DeLong); patient-level clustering and design effects; equivalence testing (TOST); precision ceilings and the no-claim rule; severity thresholds; verdict rule; controlled reporting language; reproducibility and provenance; validation; change control. Version 1.1 (4 October 2026) supersedes version 1.0 (19 September 2026). It adds a small-cluster correction to the Wilson and Newcombe intervals when patients contribute repeated images (larger of bootstrap and ANOVA design effects, a k/(k-1) factor, and a Student t critical value with k-1 degrees of freedom), and uses the exact standard intervals when no repeated images are present. Point estimates are unchanged. An audit report is a statement of findings. It is not a certification, clearance or approval of any product.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23149716
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiant Revive AI Equity Audit: Methods Document, Version 1.1 (RR-STEM v1.1)

Niya Pennie
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Radiant Revive AI Equity Audit: Methods Document, Version 1.1 (RR-STEM v1.1)

Niya Pennie
article en

Abstract

Versioned public methods document for the Radiant Revive AI Equity Audit, an independent statistical audit of how dermatology AI models perform across skin tones (engine release RR-STEM v1.1). It fixes in advance what the audit measures, how it measures it, what counts as a finding, and how findings are judged, so that nothing is chosen after a client's data has been opened. Contents: inputs and pre-processing (fingerprinting, validation, deduplication); two primary endpoints (sensitivity disparity between the lightest and darkest reportable Fitzpatrick bands, and an ordered trend in sensitivity across tone levels) with a Bonferroni family-wise policy; secondary endpoints; operating-point rule; interval methods (Wilson, Newcombe hybrid score, patient-resampled bootstrap, DeLong); patient-level clustering and design effects; equivalence testing (TOST); precision ceilings and the no-claim rule; severity thresholds; verdict rule; controlled reporting language; reproducibility and provenance; validation; change control. Version 1.1 (4 October 2026) supersedes version 1.0 (19 September 2026). It adds a small-cluster correction to the Wilson and Newcombe intervals when patients contribute repeated images (larger of bootstrap and ANOVA design effects, a k/(k-1) factor, and a Student t critical value with k-1 degrees of freedom), and uses the exact standard intervals when no repeated images are present. Point estimates are unchanged. An audit report is a statement of findings. It is not a certification, clearance or approval of any product.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.