Breed-dependent metabolic and growth responses to saturated and unsaturated fat supplements in fat-tailed and thin-tailed lambs

Abstract This study was conducted to investigate the breed-specific effects of different dietary energy sources on performance, expression of energy metabolism-related genes, and metabolic parameters in fat tailed and thin tailed sheep. A 2 × 3 factorial arrangement (two breeds × three dietary treatments) was used. Thirty-six fat tailed (Taleshi breed) and 36 thin tailed lambs (zel breed) were assigned to three dietary treatments for 116 days ( n = 12 for each Breed*diet comparison): a control diet (no fat supplement), a diet containing 4% stearic acid-rich saturated fatty acid (SFA), and a diet containing 4% protected unsaturated fatty acids (US FAS ). A significant breed × diet interaction was found for average daily gain (ADG) ( P < 0.05 ). Fat-tailed lambs fed the SFA diet had the highest ADG (115.71 g/day), which was significantly greater ( P < 0.05) than thin-tailed lambs on the same diet (108.57 g/day) and fat-tailed lambs on USFA (107.14 g/day). Dry matter intake (DMI) was not significantly affected by breed × diet interaction. Gene expression analysis showed that protected USFA significantly upregulated ( P < 0.05) LPL and FAS genes in the tail fat of fat-tailed lambs. In thin-tailed lambs, protected USFA significantly increased ( P < 0.05) subcutaneous adipose tissue expression of GLUT4, TNF-α, and IGF-1 genes. Moreover, LPL and FAS were also upregulated in thin-tailed lambs fed protected USFA. A significant breed × energy source interaction was observed for ruminal butyric acid concentration and the acetate: propionate ratio ( P < 0.05). Metabolically, fat-tailed lambs demonstrated greater insulin sensitivity, particularly when fed SFA and protected USFA, as evidenced by a significantly lower area under the curve (AUC) in the insulin tolerance test ( P < 0.05), whereas thin-tailed lambs exhibited higher insulin resistance. Plasma glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol were significantly influenced by breed × fat source interaction ( P < 0.05), with thin-tailed lambs on the SFA diet showing the highest values. Rumen parameters, including pH and protozoal count, were significantly affected by fat source ( P < 0.05) but not by breed. In conclusion, metabolic and performance responses to dietary energy sources are highly breed-dependent. Fat-tailed sheep are more efficient at utilizing SFA for growth, while protected USFA significantly modulates key metabolic genes in thin-tailed sheep. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring dietary energy strategies to the animal’s genetic background.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62401-w
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breed-dependent metabolic and growth responses to saturated and unsaturated fat supplements in fat-tailed and thin-tailed lambs

Ahmad Ghorbani, Rasoul Pirmohammadi, Hamed Khalilvandi‐Behroozyar, Behzad Asadnezhad et al.
Scientific Reports
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Breed-dependent metabolic and growth responses to saturated and unsaturated fat supplements in fat-tailed and thin-tailed lambs

Ahmad Ghorbani, Rasoul Pirmohammadi, Hamed Khalilvandi‐Behroozyar, Behzad Asadnezhad, Hamed Alipour
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study was conducted to investigate the breed-specific effects of different dietary energy sources on performance, expression of energy metabolism-related genes, and metabolic parameters in fat tailed and thin tailed sheep. A 2 × 3 factorial arrangement (two breeds × three dietary treatments) was used. Thirty-six fat tailed (Taleshi breed) and 36 thin tailed lambs (zel breed) were assigned to three dietary treatments for 116 days ( n = 12 for each Breed*diet comparison): a control diet (no fat supplement), a diet containing 4% stearic acid-rich saturated fatty acid (SFA), and a diet containing 4% protected unsaturated fatty acids (US FAS ). A significant breed × diet interaction was found for average daily gain (ADG) ( P < 0.05 ). Fat-tailed lambs fed the SFA diet had the highest ADG (115.71 g/day), which was significantly greater ( P < 0.05) than thin-tailed lambs on the same diet (108.57 g/day) and fat-tailed lambs on USFA (107.14 g/day). Dry matter intake (DMI) was not significantly affected by breed × diet interaction. Gene expression analysis showed that protected USFA significantly upregulated ( P < 0.05) LPL and FAS genes in the tail fat of fat-tailed lambs. In thin-tailed lambs, protected USFA significantly increased ( P < 0.05) subcutaneous adipose tissue expression of GLUT4, TNF-α, and IGF-1 genes. Moreover, LPL and FAS were also upregulated in thin-tailed lambs fed protected USFA. A significant breed × energy source interaction was observed for ruminal butyric acid concentration and the acetate: propionate ratio ( P < 0.05). Metabolically, fat-tailed lambs demonstrated greater insulin sensitivity, particularly when fed SFA and protected USFA, as evidenced by a significantly lower area under the curve (AUC) in the insulin tolerance test ( P < 0.05), whereas thin-tailed lambs exhibited higher insulin resistance. Plasma glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol were significantly influenced by breed × fat source interaction ( P < 0.05), with thin-tailed lambs on the SFA diet showing the highest values. Rumen parameters, including pH and protozoal count, were significantly affected by fat source ( P < 0.05) but not by breed. In conclusion, metabolic and performance responses to dietary energy sources are highly breed-dependent. Fat-tailed sheep are more efficient at utilizing SFA for growth, while protected USFA significantly modulates key metabolic genes in thin-tailed sheep. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring dietary energy strategies to the animal’s genetic background.

Scientific Reports
Urmia University (IR), Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research (IR), University of Guilan (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.