Beyond resistance: Indigenous counter-narratives on embedded extractivism in Indonesia

This study examines Indonesia’s extractive development paradigm as both an economic model and a discursive framework through which land, nature, and Indigenous life are governed. Since the New Order era, extractivism has been embedded in state narratives of growth and modernisation, presenting resource exploitation as a national obligation and moral imperative. This discourse frames land as “idle”, forests as “state assets”, and extraction as “national development” or “progress”. These terms circulate through state institutions, corporate actors, legal-permit systems, spatial planning, and policy documents, legitimising extraction and reinforcing the state-corporate nexus while marginalising Indigenous epistemologies. Using critical discourse analysis, this study finds that extractive logic persists across regimes, often concealed by the language of progress. Beyond material dispossession, extractivism operates as epistemic and ontological violence by erasing Indigenous ways of knowing land. The study shows how Indigenous peoples, including the Dayak, Awyu, and Moi, construct counter-narratives that reframe resistance as both discursive and epistemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development in Practice
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2026.2740121
Primary Topic
Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond resistance: Indigenous counter-narratives on embedded extractivism in Indonesia

Sadar Ginting, Candra Dewi
Development in Practice
Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
article

Beyond resistance: Indigenous counter-narratives on embedded extractivism in Indonesia

Sadar Ginting, Candra Dewi
article en

Abstract

This study examines Indonesia’s extractive development paradigm as both an economic model and a discursive framework through which land, nature, and Indigenous life are governed. Since the New Order era, extractivism has been embedded in state narratives of growth and modernisation, presenting resource exploitation as a national obligation and moral imperative. This discourse frames land as “idle”, forests as “state assets”, and extraction as “national development” or “progress”. These terms circulate through state institutions, corporate actors, legal-permit systems, spatial planning, and policy documents, legitimising extraction and reinforcing the state-corporate nexus while marginalising Indigenous epistemologies. Using critical discourse analysis, this study finds that extractive logic persists across regimes, often concealed by the language of progress. Beyond material dispossession, extractivism operates as epistemic and ontological violence by erasing Indigenous ways of knowing land. The study shows how Indigenous peoples, including the Dayak, Awyu, and Moi, construct counter-narratives that reframe resistance as both discursive and epistemic.

Development in Practice
EngenderHealth (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.