A scoping review of point-of-care blood testing to assess utility in ambulatory general surgery

INTRODUCTION: Ambulatory care is a national priority in the UK. Blood results play a crucial role in safe ambulatory management, but create significant time delays. Point-of-care blood testing (POCBT) could improve delivery of effective ambulatory care in General Surgery (GS). This scoping review summarises published literature on use of POCBT in hospital settings. METHODS: Systematic searches (MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare and CINAHL, from inception to January 2025) identified published studies reporting on POCBT in adult hospital settings. Searches were limited to common blood tests used for emergency GS decision-making. Abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two authors against pre-agreed eligibility criteria. Data extraction included general study and participant characteristics, details of point-of-care devices used, and outcomes, grouped into: Reliability and Accuracy, Clinical and Patient Impact, Staff Impact, and Financial Impact. FINDINGS: =3) identified a positive impact of POCBT on overall cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: POCBT could deliver timely, reliable blood results and be of benefit in ambulatory GS settings. A prospective pilot study may be the next appropriate step.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2026.0096
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of point-of-care blood testing to assess utility in ambulatory general surgery

NS Blencowe, N Amtul, CCG Davies, H Clark
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

A scoping review of point-of-care blood testing to assess utility in ambulatory general surgery

NS Blencowe, N Amtul, CCG Davies, H Clark
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ambulatory care is a national priority in the UK. Blood results play a crucial role in safe ambulatory management, but create significant time delays. Point-of-care blood testing (POCBT) could improve delivery of effective ambulatory care in General Surgery (GS). This scoping review summarises published literature on use of POCBT in hospital settings. METHODS: Systematic searches (MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare and CINAHL, from inception to January 2025) identified published studies reporting on POCBT in adult hospital settings. Searches were limited to common blood tests used for emergency GS decision-making. Abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two authors against pre-agreed eligibility criteria. Data extraction included general study and participant characteristics, details of point-of-care devices used, and outcomes, grouped into: Reliability and Accuracy, Clinical and Patient Impact, Staff Impact, and Financial Impact. FINDINGS: =3) identified a positive impact of POCBT on overall cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: POCBT could deliver timely, reliable blood results and be of benefit in ambulatory GS settings. A prospective pilot study may be the next appropriate step.

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
University of Leeds (GB), St James's University Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A scoping review of point-of-care blood testing to assess utility in ambulatory general surgery — NS Blencowe, N Amtul, et al. · Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS