Pretreatment Health‐Related Quality of Life and Survival in Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta‐Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To quantify associations between pretreatment patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains and overall survival in head and neck cancer. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception through July 27, 2026. REVIEW METHODS: Longitudinal studies evaluating validated patient-reported HRQoL as a prognostic exposure were included. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival were harmonized to a 10-point worsening and pooled by domain using restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects models. Risk of bias, multiplicity, leave-one-out stability, cohort overlap, residual-confounding sensitivity, and reporting completeness were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-two independent studies in 40 publications were included; 43 estimates contributed to meta-analyses of 10 domains. Worse Global QoL (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.08-1.14), physical functioning (1.16; 1.13-1.20), role functioning (1.09; 1.07-1.11), and social functioning (1.09; 1.06-1.12) were consistently associated with higher mortality and remained leave-one-out stable. Swallowing was associated with mortality (1.15; 1.02-1.29) but was sensitive to one study. Dyspnea was associated with higher mortality in the primary analysis (4 studies; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33), but the estimate was heterogeneous and unstable. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment HRQoL provides multidimensional prognostic information, with Global QoL and physical, role, emotional, and social functioning showing the most consistent evidence. These domains may help prioritize pretreatment supportive-care assessment, whereas sensitivity-limited or very-low-certainty findings require further confirmation and should not be interpreted as actionable treatment targets. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number: CRD420261461389.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70960
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pretreatment Health‐Related Quality of Life and Survival in Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta‐Analysis

Fangyan Zhong, Qingfei Chu, Yujie Hu, Chao Chen et al.
The Laryngoscope
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Pretreatment Health‐Related Quality of Life and Survival in Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta‐Analysis

Fangyan Zhong, Qingfei Chu, Yujie Hu, Chao Chen, Mengjia Lin, Yong Guo
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify associations between pretreatment patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains and overall survival in head and neck cancer. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception through July 27, 2026. REVIEW METHODS: Longitudinal studies evaluating validated patient-reported HRQoL as a prognostic exposure were included. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival were harmonized to a 10-point worsening and pooled by domain using restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects models. Risk of bias, multiplicity, leave-one-out stability, cohort overlap, residual-confounding sensitivity, and reporting completeness were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-two independent studies in 40 publications were included; 43 estimates contributed to meta-analyses of 10 domains. Worse Global QoL (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.08-1.14), physical functioning (1.16; 1.13-1.20), role functioning (1.09; 1.07-1.11), and social functioning (1.09; 1.06-1.12) were consistently associated with higher mortality and remained leave-one-out stable. Swallowing was associated with mortality (1.15; 1.02-1.29) but was sensitive to one study. Dyspnea was associated with higher mortality in the primary analysis (4 studies; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33), but the estimate was heterogeneous and unstable. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment HRQoL provides multidimensional prognostic information, with Global QoL and physical, role, emotional, and social functioning showing the most consistent evidence. These domains may help prioritize pretreatment supportive-care assessment, whereas sensitivity-limited or very-low-certainty findings require further confirmation and should not be interpreted as actionable treatment targets. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number: CRD420261461389.

The Laryngoscope
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.