Encouraging Justifiable Variability in the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model to Address Contextual Needs

The Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility model has been field tested for over 50 years and continues to evolve. Adapting the model to fit purpose in a teacher or instructor’s specific environment aligns with Hellison’s lifelong assertion that teaching personal and social responsibility be viewed as a flexible and adaptable process. Practitioners are empowered to interpret and implement the model in a way suited for their specific teaching or instructional contexts. The purpose of our paper is to highlight flexibility within the structure of teaching personal and social responsibility and to encourage justifiably different applications in addressing different situations. Adaptations to the model are discussed through the lens of justifiable variability and with the goal of maintaining fidelity to key components of the model rather than causing toxic mutations. We further differentiate between the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility model, programs, and aligned approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quest
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2026.2742915
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encouraging Justifiable Variability in the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model to Address Contextual Needs

K. Andrew R. Richards, John H. Williams, Michael A. Hemphill
Quest
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

Encouraging Justifiable Variability in the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model to Address Contextual Needs

K. Andrew R. Richards, John H. Williams, Michael A. Hemphill
article en

Abstract

The Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility model has been field tested for over 50 years and continues to evolve. Adapting the model to fit purpose in a teacher or instructor’s specific environment aligns with Hellison’s lifelong assertion that teaching personal and social responsibility be viewed as a flexible and adaptable process. Practitioners are empowered to interpret and implement the model in a way suited for their specific teaching or instructional contexts. The purpose of our paper is to highlight flexibility within the structure of teaching personal and social responsibility and to encourage justifiably different applications in addressing different situations. Adaptations to the model are discussed through the lens of justifiable variability and with the goal of maintaining fidelity to key components of the model rather than causing toxic mutations. We further differentiate between the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility model, programs, and aligned approaches.

Quest
University of Leicester (GB), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Encouraging Justifiable Variability in the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model to Address Contextual Needs — K. Andrew R. Richards, John H. Williams, et al. · Quest (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS