Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Sports Performance in Elite Athletes

Achievements and endurance represent distinct aspects of sports performance, influenced by different underlying factors. However, these determinants are not well characterized. To address this gap between achievements and endurance, we evaluated machine learning models to estimate the competition results-based Achievement Score and the absolute cardiorespiratory capacity-based Endurance Score in elite athletes. We analyzed these models using SHapley Additive exPlanations to identify the most influential determinants of each performance component. Altogether, 688 healthy, asymptomatic elite athletes (19.7 ± 6.9 years; males: 75%) with 1194 sports cardiology screening exams were included in our machine learning-based analysis. In a hold-out test set of randomly selected 100 athletes (21.5 ± 9.2 years, males 67%), the best-performing models predicted Achievement Score and Endurance Score with the coefficients of determination values of 0.29 (95% bootstrap CI (0.00, 0.48)) and 0.69 (95% bootstrap CI (0.56, 0.79)), respectively. For Achievement Score, the strongest determinants were training years, weekly training hours, and age. In contrast, Endurance Score was primarily driven by skeletal muscle mass, weight, and peak heart rate. These findings suggest that achievements are predominantly related to training history and experience, whereas endurance is more closely associated with body composition and sports adaptation, partly reflecting its reliance on absolute cardiorespiratory measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14100431
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Sports Performance in Elite Athletes

Márton Tokodi, Liliána Erzsébet Szabó, Hajnalka Vágó, Nóra Sydó et al.
Sports
Sports Performance and Training
article

Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Sports Performance in Elite Athletes

Márton Tokodi, Liliána Erzsébet Szabó, Hajnalka Vágó, Nóra Sydó, Attila D Kovács, Emese Csulak, Ádám Szijártó, Béla Péter Merkely, G Y Bohus, Titanilla Takács, Luca Kata Bátai, Dávid Becker, Kamilla Szabó, Zoltán Tősér
article en

Abstract

Achievements and endurance represent distinct aspects of sports performance, influenced by different underlying factors. However, these determinants are not well characterized. To address this gap between achievements and endurance, we evaluated machine learning models to estimate the competition results-based Achievement Score and the absolute cardiorespiratory capacity-based Endurance Score in elite athletes. We analyzed these models using SHapley Additive exPlanations to identify the most influential determinants of each performance component. Altogether, 688 healthy, asymptomatic elite athletes (19.7 ± 6.9 years; males: 75%) with 1194 sports cardiology screening exams were included in our machine learning-based analysis. In a hold-out test set of randomly selected 100 athletes (21.5 ± 9.2 years, males 67%), the best-performing models predicted Achievement Score and Endurance Score with the coefficients of determination values of 0.29 (95% bootstrap CI (0.00, 0.48)) and 0.69 (95% bootstrap CI (0.56, 0.79)), respectively. For Achievement Score, the strongest determinants were training years, weekly training hours, and age. In contrast, Endurance Score was primarily driven by skeletal muscle mass, weight, and peak heart rate. These findings suggest that achievements are predominantly related to training history and experience, whereas endurance is more closely associated with body composition and sports adaptation, partly reflecting its reliance on absolute cardiorespiratory measures.

SportsVol. 14(10)
Semmelweis University (HU), Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.