Evaluating Underground CO2 Storage Potential across Sedimentary Facies of the Michigan Basin

Abstract Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations demand scalable and geologically reliable carbon capture and storage solutions. The Michigan Basin, with its well-characterized Paleozoic sedimentary sequences and proximity to major industrial emission sources, represents a promising target for underground CO2 storage. This study systematically evaluates the CO2 storage potential of nine distinct sedimentary rock facies retrieved from the Consumers Brine Disposal 139 (BD-139) well, providing a facies-resolved framework for assessing subsurface sequestration capacity. High-pressure isochoric CO2 adsorption experiments were conducted across three temperature isotherms (25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C) and six pressure points (10–35 bar), complemented by comprehensive material characterization, including Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Based on their inferred mineralogical composition and thermal behavior, the nine facies were classified into three distinct groups: silicate-rich organic-bearing rocks (Group 1), siliciclastic assemblages with a subordinate carbonate component (Group 2), and carbonate-bearing dolomitic facies (Group 3). Facies 3 exhibited the highest apparent CO2 uptake, 855.7 mg/g at 35 bar and 25 °C, and all facies gave heats of sorption below 60 kJ/mol, consistent with predominantly physical interactions and with favorable reversibility for storage cycling. Because the measurements were performed on pulverized material, and because the apparent uptake of the highest-performing facies exceeds the volumetric capacity of its own pore system, these quantities are reported and interpreted throughout as apparent isochoric uptake determined under identical conditions. They provide a quantitative relative ranking of the facies rather than absolute in situ storage capacities, and the bounds governing their interpretation are set out in Section 3.5.3. Complementary CO2 absorption experiments in synthetic brine solutions yielded a solid precipitate on depressurization, indicating a potential mineral trapping pathway under high-pressure conditions. The findings establish a direct link between facies-level geological heterogeneity and CO2 storage performance, offering a practical screening framework for site selection and reservoir evaluation within the Michigan Basin and analogous sedimentary systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6c08038
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Underground CO2 Storage Potential across Sedimentary Facies of the Michigan Basin

Autumn Haagsma, Mert Atilhan, Santiago Aparício, Ashley Scott et al.
ACS Omega
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Evaluating Underground CO2 Storage Potential across Sedimentary Facies of the Michigan Basin

Autumn Haagsma, Mert Atilhan, Santiago Aparício, Ashley Scott, Ahmad Al-Bodour, Alberto Gutiérrez, Nimarta Kaur, Pablo Sanchez, Christina Miller, Emyline Kirda
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations demand scalable and geologically reliable carbon capture and storage solutions. The Michigan Basin, with its well-characterized Paleozoic sedimentary sequences and proximity to major industrial emission sources, represents a promising target for underground CO2 storage. This study systematically evaluates the CO2 storage potential of nine distinct sedimentary rock facies retrieved from the Consumers Brine Disposal 139 (BD-139) well, providing a facies-resolved framework for assessing subsurface sequestration capacity. High-pressure isochoric CO2 adsorption experiments were conducted across three temperature isotherms (25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C) and six pressure points (10–35 bar), complemented by comprehensive material characterization, including Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Based on their inferred mineralogical composition and thermal behavior, the nine facies were classified into three distinct groups: silicate-rich organic-bearing rocks (Group 1), siliciclastic assemblages with a subordinate carbonate component (Group 2), and carbonate-bearing dolomitic facies (Group 3). Facies 3 exhibited the highest apparent CO2 uptake, 855.7 mg/g at 35 bar and 25 °C, and all facies gave heats of sorption below 60 kJ/mol, consistent with predominantly physical interactions and with favorable reversibility for storage cycling. Because the measurements were performed on pulverized material, and because the apparent uptake of the highest-performing facies exceeds the volumetric capacity of its own pore system, these quantities are reported and interpreted throughout as apparent isochoric uptake determined under identical conditions. They provide a quantitative relative ranking of the facies rather than absolute in situ storage capacities, and the bounds governing their interpretation are set out in Section 3.5.3. Complementary CO2 absorption experiments in synthetic brine solutions yielded a solid precipitate on depressurization, indicating a potential mineral trapping pathway under high-pressure conditions. The findings establish a direct link between facies-level geological heterogeneity and CO2 storage performance, offering a practical screening framework for site selection and reservoir evaluation within the Michigan Basin and analogous sedimentary systems.

ACS Omega
Western Michigan University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), San Diego State University (US), Universidad de Burgos (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.