A Comparative Study of Face Recognition Techniques

Abstract Face recognition is one of the most widely used biometric methods for identifying or verifying a person from a digital image or video frame. Over the last few decades, a number of techniques have been developed for this task, ranging from early statistical approaches such as Eigenfaces and Fisherfaces to modern deep learning based methods such as FaceNet and ArcFace. This paper presents a comparative study of these techniques by discussing how each method works, along with their advantages and limitations. A simple comparison of these methods is also presented based on accuracy, robustness and computational cost, using values reported in earlier studies. The paper also discusses some common challenges faced in face recognition, such as changes in lighting, pose and occlusion, and lists some of the areas where this technology is applied today. The study shows that while traditional methods are simple and fast, deep learning based methods give much higher accuracy and are more suitable for real world conditions. Keywords: Face Recognition, Eigenfaces, LBPH, Convolutional Neural Network, FaceNet, ArcFace, Biometrics

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23159879
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Face Recognition Techniques

Vishal Shrivastava, Amit Tiwari, Abhilesh Singh, Rajnish Kumar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Face recognition and analysis
article

A Comparative Study of Face Recognition Techniques

Vishal Shrivastava, Amit Tiwari, Abhilesh Singh, Rajnish Kumar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Face recognition is one of the most widely used biometric methods for identifying or verifying a person from a digital image or video frame. Over the last few decades, a number of techniques have been developed for this task, ranging from early statistical approaches such as Eigenfaces and Fisherfaces to modern deep learning based methods such as FaceNet and ArcFace. This paper presents a comparative study of these techniques by discussing how each method works, along with their advantages and limitations. A simple comparison of these methods is also presented based on accuracy, robustness and computational cost, using values reported in earlier studies. The paper also discusses some common challenges faced in face recognition, such as changes in lighting, pose and occlusion, and lists some of the areas where this technology is applied today. The study shows that while traditional methods are simple and fast, deep learning based methods give much higher accuracy and are more suitable for real world conditions. Keywords: Face Recognition, Eigenfaces, LBPH, Convolutional Neural Network, FaceNet, ArcFace, Biometrics

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Face recognition and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of Face Recognition Techniques — Vishal Shrivastava, Amit Tiwari, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS