Leximin budget allocation across heterogeneous budgeted Markov decision processes

We study how to allocate a common budget across agents facing heterogeneous finite-horizon budgeted Markov decision processes so as to optimize the resulting value vector according to the leximin criterion. Boutilier and Lu (2016) show that, under deterministic policies, each agent’s attainable value is represented by finitely many budget-value pairs. Using this finite representation, we establish an exact two-stage decomposition of the leximin allocation problem. First, the leximin criterion requires maximizing the number of agents attaining positive value. Second, conditional on this maximum number, the planner must jointly decide which agents receive positive budgets and which budget levels are assigned to them. This second-stage finite problem can be formulated as a leximin multiple-choice knapsack problem with a cardinality constraint and solved exactly by dynamic programming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discrete Optimization
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disopt.2026.100972
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leximin budget allocation across heterogeneous budgeted Markov decision processes

Hideaki Goto
Discrete Optimization
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Leximin budget allocation across heterogeneous budgeted Markov decision processes

Hideaki Goto
article en

Abstract

We study how to allocate a common budget across agents facing heterogeneous finite-horizon budgeted Markov decision processes so as to optimize the resulting value vector according to the leximin criterion. Boutilier and Lu (2016) show that, under deterministic policies, each agent’s attainable value is represented by finitely many budget-value pairs. Using this finite representation, we establish an exact two-stage decomposition of the leximin allocation problem. First, the leximin criterion requires maximizing the number of agents attaining positive value. Second, conditional on this maximum number, the planner must jointly decide which agents receive positive budgets and which budget levels are assigned to them. This second-stage finite problem can be formulated as a leximin multiple-choice knapsack problem with a cardinality constraint and solved exactly by dynamic programming.

Discrete OptimizationVol. 62
International University of Japan (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leximin budget allocation across heterogeneous budgeted Markov decision processes — Hideaki Goto · Discrete Optimization (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS