Quantitative assessment of cervical spinal cord injury: Methods, clinical utility, and future directions

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: To provide a structured narrative summary of quantitative assessment methods for cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), analyze their stage-specific applicability, discuss limitations, and clarify the clinical utility and future integration of wearable sensors and artificial intelligence (AI). METHODS: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO to identify English-language, peer-reviewed studies published between 1967 and 2026 on quantitative assessment of traumatic and non-traumatic cervical SCI. The search covered imaging, neurological and functional evaluation, electrophysiology, biomechanics, wearable monitoring, artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, and multimodal data integration. An updated PubMed search performed on May 15, 2026 identified 1,042 records. After title and abstract screening, 873 records were retained as potentially relevant, and 73 unique publications were included in the final narrative synthesis following full-text review and deduplication. RESULTS: Main methods include imaging (CT, MRI/DTI, AI-image analysis), neurological scales (ASIA/ISNCSCI, SCIM, WISCI), neuroelectrophysiology (SSEP, MEP, EMG), biomechanics (sEMG and kinematics), and wearable sensors. These methods provide complementary structural, neurological, functional, and real-world activity information across acute care, rehabilitation, and long-term follow-up. Current approaches remain limited by subjectivity, poor real-time monitoring, limited quantification precision, equipment dependence, and insensitivity to early or subclinical changes. Wearable-AI integration may improve continuous monitoring, risk prediction, pressure injury prevention, and the selection of patients who may benefit from transcutaneous or epidural stimulation. CONCLUSION: Current quantitative assessment methods for cervical SCI are insufficient when used alone. A staged, multimodal strategy that combines conventional clinical assessment with wearable sensing and AI-supported analysis may improve full-process management, clinical decision-making, and prognostic assessment in cervical SCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2026.2719095
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative assessment of cervical spinal cord injury: Methods, clinical utility, and future directions

Shuo Sun, 许天明, Xingyu Li, Yong Wang et al.
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Quantitative assessment of cervical spinal cord injury: Methods, clinical utility, and future directions

Shuo Sun, 许天明, Xingyu Li, Yong Wang, Xiaodong Wu, Wenyu Zhang, Hui Wang
article en

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: To provide a structured narrative summary of quantitative assessment methods for cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), analyze their stage-specific applicability, discuss limitations, and clarify the clinical utility and future integration of wearable sensors and artificial intelligence (AI). METHODS: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO to identify English-language, peer-reviewed studies published between 1967 and 2026 on quantitative assessment of traumatic and non-traumatic cervical SCI. The search covered imaging, neurological and functional evaluation, electrophysiology, biomechanics, wearable monitoring, artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, and multimodal data integration. An updated PubMed search performed on May 15, 2026 identified 1,042 records. After title and abstract screening, 873 records were retained as potentially relevant, and 73 unique publications were included in the final narrative synthesis following full-text review and deduplication. RESULTS: Main methods include imaging (CT, MRI/DTI, AI-image analysis), neurological scales (ASIA/ISNCSCI, SCIM, WISCI), neuroelectrophysiology (SSEP, MEP, EMG), biomechanics (sEMG and kinematics), and wearable sensors. These methods provide complementary structural, neurological, functional, and real-world activity information across acute care, rehabilitation, and long-term follow-up. Current approaches remain limited by subjectivity, poor real-time monitoring, limited quantification precision, equipment dependence, and insensitivity to early or subclinical changes. Wearable-AI integration may improve continuous monitoring, risk prediction, pressure injury prevention, and the selection of patients who may benefit from transcutaneous or epidural stimulation. CONCLUSION: Current quantitative assessment methods for cervical SCI are insufficient when used alone. A staged, multimodal strategy that combines conventional clinical assessment with wearable sensing and AI-supported analysis may improve full-process management, clinical decision-making, and prognostic assessment in cervical SCI.

Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Second Military Medical University (CN), Shanghai Changzheng Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.