Gleason pattern 4 length and active surveillance eligibility in Grade Group 2–4 prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether total Gleason pattern 4 (GP4) length provides better risk stratification than current risk group criteria for determining potential active surveillance (AS) eligibility, using oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with Grade Group (GG) 2-4 disease on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted and systematic biopsy who underwent RP. We calculated total GP4 length as the summed millimetres of GP4 in systematic cores plus the average across MRI-targeted cores. Concordance analysis was used to evaluate how increasing GG corresponded to greater GP4 burden. We compared prediction of adverse pathology at RP and 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) between risk groups and total length of GP4. RESULTS: Among 2499 patients, 1691, 694, and 114 had GG2, GG3, and GG4 disease, of whom 73%, 19%, and 15% had low amounts (<2 mm) of GP4. Patients with <2 mm of GP4, regardless of GG, had similar risks of adverse pathology (5.2% vs 5.0%) and 5-year BCR (20% vs 21%) as those with favourable intermediate-risk disease; if used as an AS threshold, <2 mm of GP4 would classify approximately twice as many patients as AS eligible, translating to ~50 000 men annually in the United States alone. CONCLUSIONS: Total length of GP4 provides better risk stratification for AS eligibility than current favourable intermediate-risk group criteria. Further defining the optimal method for GP4 quantification and determining the appropriate cut-point is needed before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Urology
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70478
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gleason pattern 4 length and active surveillance eligibility in Grade Group 2–4 prostate cancer

Victor E. Reuter, Behfar Ehdaie, Samson W. Fine, Andrew Julian Vickers et al.
British Journal of Urology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Gleason pattern 4 length and active surveillance eligibility in Grade Group 2–4 prostate cancer

Victor E. Reuter, Behfar Ehdaie, Samson W. Fine, Andrew Julian Vickers, Melissa J. Assel, Nate Aiken, Nicholas A. Pickersgill, Nicole E. Benfante, Sean A. Fletcher
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether total Gleason pattern 4 (GP4) length provides better risk stratification than current risk group criteria for determining potential active surveillance (AS) eligibility, using oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with Grade Group (GG) 2-4 disease on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted and systematic biopsy who underwent RP. We calculated total GP4 length as the summed millimetres of GP4 in systematic cores plus the average across MRI-targeted cores. Concordance analysis was used to evaluate how increasing GG corresponded to greater GP4 burden. We compared prediction of adverse pathology at RP and 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) between risk groups and total length of GP4. RESULTS: Among 2499 patients, 1691, 694, and 114 had GG2, GG3, and GG4 disease, of whom 73%, 19%, and 15% had low amounts (<2 mm) of GP4. Patients with <2 mm of GP4, regardless of GG, had similar risks of adverse pathology (5.2% vs 5.0%) and 5-year BCR (20% vs 21%) as those with favourable intermediate-risk disease; if used as an AS threshold, <2 mm of GP4 would classify approximately twice as many patients as AS eligible, translating to ~50 000 men annually in the United States alone. CONCLUSIONS: Total length of GP4 provides better risk stratification for AS eligibility than current favourable intermediate-risk group criteria. Further defining the optimal method for GP4 quantification and determining the appropriate cut-point is needed before clinical implementation.

British Journal of Urology
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.