Comparative field and laboratory efficacy of botanical and mineral-based treatments against Artona chorista in large cardamom in eastern Nepal

Large cardamom ( Amomum subulatum Roxb.) is an economically important cash crop of the eastern Himalayas; however, its productivity is severely constrained by the leaf-eating caterpillar Artona chorista , a major defoliating pest in cardamom-growing regions of Nepal. Although non-synthetic treatments are increasingly encouraged in organic and low-residue production systems, comparative evidence linking field efficacy with laboratory toxicity under a unified experimental framework remains limited. This study evaluated four botanical, mineral-based, and traditional treatments, namely neem oil, mineral oil, titepati ( Artemisia vulgaris ) oil, and cow-dung urine, against A. chorista in Taplejung district, Nepal, using a randomized complete block design in the field and a completely randomized design in parallel laboratory bioassays. Under field conditions, neem oil (2.5 mL L⁻¹) gave the greatest reduction in larval population relative to the pre-treatment baseline (98.1%), followed by mineral oil (86.3%), titepati oil (79.6%), and cow-dung urine (65.5%); at the final observation the four treatments differed significantly from the untreated control but not from one another. In the laboratory bioassay, mineral oil caused the highest larval mortality (98.5% raw; 98.3% after Abbott correction), whereas neem oil ranked second (87.5% raw; 86.1% corrected). This reversal between settings may reflect differences in known modes of action and exposure conditions: neem effects can develop through feeding over time, whereas mineral oil relies more strongly on direct contact under controlled exposure. Neem oil gave the numerically strongest field suppression of A. chorista , while mineral oil may warrant further evaluation for situations requiring rapid knockdown with good spray coverage. The combined field-laboratory approach helps explain why field and laboratory efficacy rankings differ and supports more cautious, mechanistically informed pest-management guidance for large cardamom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Agriculture
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-026-00788-w
Primary Topic
Insect Pest Control Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative field and laboratory efficacy of botanical and mineral-based treatments against Artona chorista in large cardamom in eastern Nepal

Pranisha Bhattarai, Pratikshya lamichhane, Lokendra Nath Yogi, Janak Adhikari
Discover Agriculture
Insect Pest Control Strategies
article

Comparative field and laboratory efficacy of botanical and mineral-based treatments against Artona chorista in large cardamom in eastern Nepal

Pranisha Bhattarai, Pratikshya lamichhane, Lokendra Nath Yogi, Janak Adhikari
article en

Abstract

Large cardamom ( Amomum subulatum Roxb.) is an economically important cash crop of the eastern Himalayas; however, its productivity is severely constrained by the leaf-eating caterpillar Artona chorista , a major defoliating pest in cardamom-growing regions of Nepal. Although non-synthetic treatments are increasingly encouraged in organic and low-residue production systems, comparative evidence linking field efficacy with laboratory toxicity under a unified experimental framework remains limited. This study evaluated four botanical, mineral-based, and traditional treatments, namely neem oil, mineral oil, titepati ( Artemisia vulgaris ) oil, and cow-dung urine, against A. chorista in Taplejung district, Nepal, using a randomized complete block design in the field and a completely randomized design in parallel laboratory bioassays. Under field conditions, neem oil (2.5 mL L⁻¹) gave the greatest reduction in larval population relative to the pre-treatment baseline (98.1%), followed by mineral oil (86.3%), titepati oil (79.6%), and cow-dung urine (65.5%); at the final observation the four treatments differed significantly from the untreated control but not from one another. In the laboratory bioassay, mineral oil caused the highest larval mortality (98.5% raw; 98.3% after Abbott correction), whereas neem oil ranked second (87.5% raw; 86.1% corrected). This reversal between settings may reflect differences in known modes of action and exposure conditions: neem effects can develop through feeding over time, whereas mineral oil relies more strongly on direct contact under controlled exposure. Neem oil gave the numerically strongest field suppression of A. chorista , while mineral oil may warrant further evaluation for situations requiring rapid knockdown with good spray coverage. The combined field-laboratory approach helps explain why field and laboratory efficacy rankings differ and supports more cautious, mechanistically informed pest-management guidance for large cardamom.

Discover AgricultureVol. 4(1)
Tribhuvan University (NP), Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Fort Valley State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Insect Pest Control Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.