Tracing Organs, Tracing Responsibility: The Indonesia–Cambodia Case and the Accountability Gap in Trafficking for Organ Removal

This Letter responds to Gawronska’s (2023) analysis of illicit organ removal by extending the discussion from legal frameworks to institutional accountability. Using the Indonesia–Cambodia case as a contemporary illustration, it introduces responsibility traceability as an analytical lens for examining whether institutional responsibility can be reconstructed across trafficking trajectories involving multiple agencies and jurisdictions. While transplantation governance emphasizes tracing organs, donors, and recipients, anti-trafficking governance also requires attention to which institutions encountered potential victims, what information was available, who had authority to intervene, and where opportunities for protection became disconnected. The Letter argues that an accountability gap may persist even where individual institutions have defined responsibilities when those responsibilities cannot be connected across the trafficking trajectory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Trafficking
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2026.2744228
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing Organs, Tracing Responsibility: The Indonesia–Cambodia Case and the Accountability Gap in Trafficking for Organ Removal

Ahmad Nizar Hilmi, Adam Jamal
Journal of Human Trafficking
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Tracing Organs, Tracing Responsibility: The Indonesia–Cambodia Case and the Accountability Gap in Trafficking for Organ Removal

Ahmad Nizar Hilmi, Adam Jamal
article en

Abstract

This Letter responds to Gawronska’s (2023) analysis of illicit organ removal by extending the discussion from legal frameworks to institutional accountability. Using the Indonesia–Cambodia case as a contemporary illustration, it introduces responsibility traceability as an analytical lens for examining whether institutional responsibility can be reconstructed across trafficking trajectories involving multiple agencies and jurisdictions. While transplantation governance emphasizes tracing organs, donors, and recipients, anti-trafficking governance also requires attention to which institutions encountered potential victims, what information was available, who had authority to intervene, and where opportunities for protection became disconnected. The Letter argues that an accountability gap may persist even where individual institutions have defined responsibilities when those responsibilities cannot be connected across the trafficking trajectory.

Journal of Human Trafficking
Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tracing Organs, Tracing Responsibility: The Indonesia–Cambodia Case and the Accountability Gap in Trafficking for Organ Removal — Ahmad Nizar Hilmi, Adam Jamal · Journal of Human Trafficking (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS