How Criminal History Informs—and Misinforms—Decision-Making in the Criminal Legal System

Criminal history is among the most influential factors shaping decisions in the modern criminal legal system. Prior record affects outcomes at every stage, from charging through parole. Although long considered relevant to punishment, contemporary policies and practices disproportionately inflate criminal history's impact. Upon close inspection, the traditional normative and empirical justifications (e.g., retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation) provide insufficient support for many current prior record policies and practices. Nevertheless, prior record's impact is profound, adding to mass incarceration and exacerbating cumulative disadvantage. In this review, we discuss the reliance on prior record in both formal policy and informal discretionary decision-making. We offer a theoretical framing of prior record that is consistent with historical practice and consonant with punishment philosophy and discuss several suggestions for right-sizing prior record policy and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Criminology
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-060826-033637
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Criminal History Informs—and Misinforms—Decision-Making in the Criminal Legal System

Rhys Hester, Miranda A. Galvin
Annual Review of Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

How Criminal History Informs—and Misinforms—Decision-Making in the Criminal Legal System

Rhys Hester, Miranda A. Galvin
article en

Abstract

Criminal history is among the most influential factors shaping decisions in the modern criminal legal system. Prior record affects outcomes at every stage, from charging through parole. Although long considered relevant to punishment, contemporary policies and practices disproportionately inflate criminal history's impact. Upon close inspection, the traditional normative and empirical justifications (e.g., retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation) provide insufficient support for many current prior record policies and practices. Nevertheless, prior record's impact is profound, adding to mass incarceration and exacerbating cumulative disadvantage. In this review, we discuss the reliance on prior record in both formal policy and informal discretionary decision-making. We offer a theoretical framing of prior record that is consistent with historical practice and consonant with punishment philosophy and discuss several suggestions for right-sizing prior record policy and practice.

Annual Review of Criminology
Pennsylvania State University (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.