CEDAW, Digital Violence and State Due Diligence: Assessing India’s Response within a Global Framework

Abstract Online gender-based violence (OGBV) is escalating worldwide. This article argues that the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), read together with its General Recommendations, provides an operationalizable due diligence framework for evaluating state responsibility for OGBV across prevention, protection, prosecution, punishment and reparation. It develops this argument through India, where a rapidly expanding digital-regulatory landscape offers an important site for assessing how due diligence obligations are translated into domestic law, enforcement, intermediary regulation and civil-society interventions. The article assesses the state’s alignment with CEDAW and identifies structural challenges hindering compliance, including regulatory fragmentation, weak enforcement, limited cross-sectoral coordination, inadequate remedies, competing rights concerns and entrenched misogyny. It provides a structured method for assessing state accountability and shows that digital due diligence must be operationalised through coordinated, survivor-centred, rights-sensitive digital governance. It advances debates on digital governance, gender justice and state responsibility under international law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Review
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-026-00774-1
Primary Topic
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CEDAW, Digital Violence and State Due Diligence: Assessing India’s Response within a Global Framework

Cameran Ashraf, Shirin Naseer
Human Rights Review
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
article

CEDAW, Digital Violence and State Due Diligence: Assessing India’s Response within a Global Framework

Cameran Ashraf, Shirin Naseer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Online gender-based violence (OGBV) is escalating worldwide. This article argues that the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), read together with its General Recommendations, provides an operationalizable due diligence framework for evaluating state responsibility for OGBV across prevention, protection, prosecution, punishment and reparation. It develops this argument through India, where a rapidly expanding digital-regulatory landscape offers an important site for assessing how due diligence obligations are translated into domestic law, enforcement, intermediary regulation and civil-society interventions. The article assesses the state’s alignment with CEDAW and identifies structural challenges hindering compliance, including regulatory fragmentation, weak enforcement, limited cross-sectoral coordination, inadequate remedies, competing rights concerns and entrenched misogyny. It provides a structured method for assessing state accountability and shows that digital due diligence must be operationalised through coordinated, survivor-centred, rights-sensitive digital governance. It advances debates on digital governance, gender justice and state responsibility under international law.

Human Rights Review
Central European University (AT), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.