Generative AI and the balance of effort in group tasks: Appropriate, over-, and under-scaffolding

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) is increasingly used in higher education, yet its role in collaborative learning remains unclear. This study examines how students use Gen-AI during group lesson-planning tasks in an undergraduate education course. Drawing on Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, we introduce the concept of “an effort space” and apply the categories of appropriate, over-, and under-scaffolding to Gen-AI use. The analysis of 75 students’ reflections, chat logs, and lesson plans identified three patterns: appropriate support that preserved learner effort, over-scaffolding through task outsourcing or free-riding that eliminates learner effort, and under-scaffolding through AI avoidance. These patterns show how Gen-AI reshapes collaborative learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2026.2724351
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI and the balance of effort in group tasks: Appropriate, over-, and under-scaffolding

Jamie Costley, Anna Korchak, Christopher Hughes
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Generative AI and the balance of effort in group tasks: Appropriate, over-, and under-scaffolding

Jamie Costley, Anna Korchak, Christopher Hughes
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) is increasingly used in higher education, yet its role in collaborative learning remains unclear. This study examines how students use Gen-AI during group lesson-planning tasks in an undergraduate education course. Drawing on Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, we introduce the concept of “an effort space” and apply the categories of appropriate, over-, and under-scaffolding to Gen-AI use. The analysis of 75 students’ reflections, chat logs, and lesson plans identified three patterns: appropriate support that preserved learner effort, over-scaffolding through task outsourcing or free-riding that eliminates learner effort, and under-scaffolding through AI avoidance. These patterns show how Gen-AI reshapes collaborative learning.

Journal of Research on Technology in Education
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), United Arab Emirates University (AE), University of Illinois System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.