Effects and Safety of Grape Skin Enzyme Fermentation Extract for Eye Fatigue and Dry Eye Symptoms: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial

Dry eye disease impairs visual function and quality of life. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of grape skin enzyme fermentation extract (KL-GEFE; Nunaezone, Kitto Life Co., Ltd., Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea), a grape skin enzyme fermentation extract, in adults with ocular fatigue and dry-eye-related symptoms. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at Dankook University Hospital, 68 adults were allocated 1:1 to KL-GEFE (400 mg/day) or placebo. The study protocol specified the Schirmer I test, adapted Eye Strain Questionnaire (ESQ), noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT), fluorescein tear break-up time (TBUT), ocular-surface staining, critical flicker fusion frequency (CFF), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) as efficacy outcomes but did not assign them a formal hierarchy. The protocol-specified efficacy analysis used baseline-adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) in the per-protocol set (PPS; n = 65), with supportive analysis in the full analysis set (FAS; n = 68) using last observation carried forward (LOCF). At week 12, the adjusted KL-GEFE-minus-placebo difference was 4.46 mm for the Schirmer I test (95% CI 2.96–5.95; P < 0.001) and −4.29 points for the adapted ESQ total score (95% CI −8.39 to −0.19; P = 0.041). The corresponding FAS–LOCF estimates were 4.36 mm (95% CI 2.92–5.80; P < 0.001) and −4.56 points (95% CI −8.57 to −0.56; P = 0.026), respectively. The week 12 OSDI difference was not statistically significant, and no statistically significant week 12 between-group differences were observed for NIBUT, fluorescein TBUT, CFF, or ocular-surface staining. Two mild adverse events unrelated to the study product occurred; no serious adverse events occurred. KL-GEFE supplementation was associated with week 12 between-group differences in Schirmer I test values and adapted ESQ total scores, whereas no statistically significant week 12 between-group differences were observed for the other efficacy outcomes. Given the absence of a prospectively defined outcome hierarchy and multiplicity-control framework, these findings should be considered exploratory and require confirmation in prospectively designed trials. Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS; https://cris.nih.go.kr ), KCT0012279, registered on 14 July 2026; retrospectively registered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-026-01509-8
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects and Safety of Grape Skin Enzyme Fermentation Extract for Eye Fatigue and Dry Eye Symptoms: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial

Hyun Pil Yang, Kyong Jin Cho, Hoon Kim, Yuli Park
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Effects and Safety of Grape Skin Enzyme Fermentation Extract for Eye Fatigue and Dry Eye Symptoms: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial

Hyun Pil Yang, Kyong Jin Cho, Hoon Kim, Yuli Park
article en

Abstract

Dry eye disease impairs visual function and quality of life. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of grape skin enzyme fermentation extract (KL-GEFE; Nunaezone, Kitto Life Co., Ltd., Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea), a grape skin enzyme fermentation extract, in adults with ocular fatigue and dry-eye-related symptoms. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at Dankook University Hospital, 68 adults were allocated 1:1 to KL-GEFE (400 mg/day) or placebo. The study protocol specified the Schirmer I test, adapted Eye Strain Questionnaire (ESQ), noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT), fluorescein tear break-up time (TBUT), ocular-surface staining, critical flicker fusion frequency (CFF), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) as efficacy outcomes but did not assign them a formal hierarchy. The protocol-specified efficacy analysis used baseline-adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) in the per-protocol set (PPS; n = 65), with supportive analysis in the full analysis set (FAS; n = 68) using last observation carried forward (LOCF). At week 12, the adjusted KL-GEFE-minus-placebo difference was 4.46 mm for the Schirmer I test (95% CI 2.96–5.95; P < 0.001) and −4.29 points for the adapted ESQ total score (95% CI −8.39 to −0.19; P = 0.041). The corresponding FAS–LOCF estimates were 4.36 mm (95% CI 2.92–5.80; P < 0.001) and −4.56 points (95% CI −8.57 to −0.56; P = 0.026), respectively. The week 12 OSDI difference was not statistically significant, and no statistically significant week 12 between-group differences were observed for NIBUT, fluorescein TBUT, CFF, or ocular-surface staining. Two mild adverse events unrelated to the study product occurred; no serious adverse events occurred. KL-GEFE supplementation was associated with week 12 between-group differences in Schirmer I test values and adapted ESQ total scores, whereas no statistically significant week 12 between-group differences were observed for the other efficacy outcomes. Given the absence of a prospectively defined outcome hierarchy and multiplicity-control framework, these findings should be considered exploratory and require confirmation in prospectively designed trials. Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS; https://cris.nih.go.kr ), KCT0012279, registered on 14 July 2026; retrospectively registered.

Ophthalmology and Therapy
Pyeongtaek University (KR), Dankook University Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.