Comparison Between Eccentric-Concentric and Eccentric-Only Dumbbell Arm Curl Exercise Training for Their Effects on Neuromuscular Adaptations

ABSTRACT: Shibata, K, Yamaguchi, T, Takizawa, K, and Nosaka, K. Comparison between eccentric-concentric and eccentric-only dumbbell arm curl exercise training for their effects on neuromuscular adaptations. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-Eccentric-concentric (ECC-CON), low-load (ECC-Low), and high-load eccentric-only (ECC-High) dumbbell arm-curl exercise training were compared to test the hypothesis that ECC-Low would induce similar neuromuscular adaptations to ECC-CON and ECC-High. Thirty-four male university students without regular elbow flexor resistance exercise training were placed to ECC-CON (n = 11), ECC-Low (n = 11), or ECC-High (n = 12) group, and trained twice weekly for 6 weeks. The training load was progressively increased from 30 to 90% of concentric-only one-repetition maximum (CON1-RM) for ECC-CON and ECC-Low, and of eccentric-only 1-RM (ECC1-RM) for ECC-High. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded after each set and averaged RPE was obtained. Changes in elbow flexion CON1-RM and ECC1-RM, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) strength at 30°, 60°, and 90° elbow flexion, concentric peak power at 30% MVIC, and biceps brachii and brachialis muscle thickness (MT) were compared between groups by split-plot analyses of variance. RPE was lower (p < 0.05) in ECC-Low (4.0 ± 0.7) and ECC-High (5.1 ± 1.1) than ECC-CON (6.2 ± 1.1). ECC1-RM, MVIC strength at all angles, and concentric peak power increased (p < 0.01) similarly between groups (e.g., ECC1-RM, ECC-CON: 9.8 ± 4.8%, ECC-Low: 10.3 ± 4.9%, ECC-High: 12.8 ± 7.1%), but increases (p < 0.01) in CON1-RM (ECC-CON: 11.8 ± 7.1%, ECC-High: 9.9 ± 5.3%) and MT (3.9 ± 3.1%, 5.4 ± 4.4%) were evident only after ECC-CON and ECC-High without a difference. These results did not fully support the hypothesis, but ECC-Low was effective for improving 6 of 8 measures similarly to ECC-High and ECC-CON with lower RPE. This suggests the efficacy of eccentric-only resistance exercise training for individuals who are novice in elbow flexor resistance exercise training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005685
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Between Eccentric-Concentric and Eccentric-Only Dumbbell Arm Curl Exercise Training for Their Effects on Neuromuscular Adaptations

Taichi Yamaguchi, Kazunori Nosaka, Kazuki Takizawa, Keisuke Shibata
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison Between Eccentric-Concentric and Eccentric-Only Dumbbell Arm Curl Exercise Training for Their Effects on Neuromuscular Adaptations

Taichi Yamaguchi, Kazunori Nosaka, Kazuki Takizawa, Keisuke Shibata
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Shibata, K, Yamaguchi, T, Takizawa, K, and Nosaka, K. Comparison between eccentric-concentric and eccentric-only dumbbell arm curl exercise training for their effects on neuromuscular adaptations. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-Eccentric-concentric (ECC-CON), low-load (ECC-Low), and high-load eccentric-only (ECC-High) dumbbell arm-curl exercise training were compared to test the hypothesis that ECC-Low would induce similar neuromuscular adaptations to ECC-CON and ECC-High. Thirty-four male university students without regular elbow flexor resistance exercise training were placed to ECC-CON (n = 11), ECC-Low (n = 11), or ECC-High (n = 12) group, and trained twice weekly for 6 weeks. The training load was progressively increased from 30 to 90% of concentric-only one-repetition maximum (CON1-RM) for ECC-CON and ECC-Low, and of eccentric-only 1-RM (ECC1-RM) for ECC-High. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded after each set and averaged RPE was obtained. Changes in elbow flexion CON1-RM and ECC1-RM, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) strength at 30°, 60°, and 90° elbow flexion, concentric peak power at 30% MVIC, and biceps brachii and brachialis muscle thickness (MT) were compared between groups by split-plot analyses of variance. RPE was lower (p < 0.05) in ECC-Low (4.0 ± 0.7) and ECC-High (5.1 ± 1.1) than ECC-CON (6.2 ± 1.1). ECC1-RM, MVIC strength at all angles, and concentric peak power increased (p < 0.01) similarly between groups (e.g., ECC1-RM, ECC-CON: 9.8 ± 4.8%, ECC-Low: 10.3 ± 4.9%, ECC-High: 12.8 ± 7.1%), but increases (p < 0.01) in CON1-RM (ECC-CON: 11.8 ± 7.1%, ECC-High: 9.9 ± 5.3%) and MT (3.9 ± 3.1%, 5.4 ± 4.4%) were evident only after ECC-CON and ECC-High without a difference. These results did not fully support the hypothesis, but ECC-Low was effective for improving 6 of 8 measures similarly to ECC-High and ECC-CON with lower RPE. This suggests the efficacy of eccentric-only resistance exercise training for individuals who are novice in elbow flexor resistance exercise training.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Edith Cowan University (AU), Rakuno Gakuen University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.