A Compact Unified Model for Moderate-to-Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis Using Image Segmentation: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new artificial intelligence model, the compact unified model (CU-Model), for moderate-to-severe carotid artery stenosis using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images compared to clinical reference standards. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 156 patients with confirmed moderate-to-severe carotid artery stenosis were included. A pretrained CU-Model (trained on public non-clinical datasets for optical flow and stereo matching) was applied to raw DSA images without any fine-tuning on clinical data to avoid data leakage. The model served exclusively as a post-acquisition support tool: cardiologists applied it immediately after procedures for automated vessel segmentation and highlighting. Final North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) measurements and interpreta-tions were performed manually under expert supervision by 2 blinded researchers. RESULTS: The CU-Model identified left internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis in 84 patients and right ICA stenosis in 72. It misclassified only 1 moderate left ICA stenosis case as normal, achieving 99.4% sensitivity (155/156) for any stenosis detection. For stenosis severity grading, strong agreement with DSA was observed (moderate: 57.68 ± 5.94 vs. 57.71 ± 6.19, r = 0.83, P < .001, 95% CI: 0.76-0.88; severe: 86.96 ± 5.97 vs. 87.02 ± 6.18, r = 0.91, P < .001, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95). Of 156 cases, 106 were moderate (50%-69%) and 50 severe (≥70%), using NASCET-adapted thresholds accounting for measurement variability. Hypertension (77%), smoking, and syncope were common, with significant association in symptomatic patients (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The CU-Model demonstrates strong concordance with DSA as a practical, post-procedure support tool for vessel segmentation. Pending larger validation studies, it shows promise for enhancing clinical workflow efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14744/anatoljcardiol.2026.5879
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Compact Unified Model for Moderate-to-Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis Using Image Segmentation: A Multicenter Study.

Talat Tavlı, Ahmet Tavlı, İlker Gül, Bülent Çümen et al.
PubMed
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

A Compact Unified Model for Moderate-to-Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis Using Image Segmentation: A Multicenter Study.

Talat Tavlı, Ahmet Tavlı, İlker Gül, Bülent Çümen, Murat Ertürk, Haluk Mergen, Haydar Yaşa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new artificial intelligence model, the compact unified model (CU-Model), for moderate-to-severe carotid artery stenosis using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images compared to clinical reference standards. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 156 patients with confirmed moderate-to-severe carotid artery stenosis were included. A pretrained CU-Model (trained on public non-clinical datasets for optical flow and stereo matching) was applied to raw DSA images without any fine-tuning on clinical data to avoid data leakage. The model served exclusively as a post-acquisition support tool: cardiologists applied it immediately after procedures for automated vessel segmentation and highlighting. Final North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) measurements and interpreta-tions were performed manually under expert supervision by 2 blinded researchers. RESULTS: The CU-Model identified left internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis in 84 patients and right ICA stenosis in 72. It misclassified only 1 moderate left ICA stenosis case as normal, achieving 99.4% sensitivity (155/156) for any stenosis detection. For stenosis severity grading, strong agreement with DSA was observed (moderate: 57.68 ± 5.94 vs. 57.71 ± 6.19, r = 0.83, P < .001, 95% CI: 0.76-0.88; severe: 86.96 ± 5.97 vs. 87.02 ± 6.18, r = 0.91, P < .001, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95). Of 156 cases, 106 were moderate (50%-69%) and 50 severe (≥70%), using NASCET-adapted thresholds accounting for measurement variability. Hypertension (77%), smoking, and syncope were common, with significant association in symptomatic patients (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The CU-Model demonstrates strong concordance with DSA as a practical, post-procedure support tool for vessel segmentation. Pending larger validation studies, it shows promise for enhancing clinical workflow efficiency.

PubMed
Izmir University (TR), Başkent University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Özyeğin University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.