Geographic variation in access to Medicare-subsidised psychotherapy

Objective Within Australia, evidence is limited regarding how access to mental health care varies across geographical regions, and which areas experience the lowest levels of service use. This study aimed to provide new population-level evidence on the geographic variation in the use of Medicare-subsidised psychotherapy over the past decade and identify regions with the lowest service use. Methods We used administrative data from the Medicare Benefits Schedule to identify 2.7 million adults aged 25–54 years across mainland Australian states with a new mental health treatment plan from a general practitioner between 2014 and 2023. State-level trends were examined by calculating the proportion of individuals who accessed Medicare-subsidised psychotherapy within 3 months of receiving their mental health treatment plan in each state per year. We then examined variation in the use of psychotherapy across regions in 2023 (Statistical Area Level 4), and assessed how this psychotherapy use was associated with area-level socioeconomic disadvantage. Results Between 2014 and 2023, psychotherapy use among adults with a mental health treatment plan declined substantially across all states, from approximately 60% of adults in 2014 to <50% in 2023. Psychotherapy use also varied markedly across sub-state regions (Statistical Area Level 4s) in 2023, with uptake ranging from 36% in Sydney’s Outer South West to 60% in Perth’s inner suburbs. Access was generally lower in non-metropolitan regions and in areas with higher socioeconomic disadvantage. Conclusions The results highlight the need for system supports that make psychological services more accessible, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Addressing access gaps will require coordinated efforts across general practice, service delivery and policy settings. Prioritising support and policies towards regions with the poorest access can assist with designing a more equitable mental health system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Health Review
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ah26029
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geographic variation in access to Medicare-subsidised psychotherapy

Trong‐Anh Trinh, Nicole Black, Danusha Jayawardana, David W. Johnston
Australian Health Review
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Geographic variation in access to Medicare-subsidised psychotherapy

Trong‐Anh Trinh, Nicole Black, Danusha Jayawardana, David W. Johnston
article en

Abstract

Objective Within Australia, evidence is limited regarding how access to mental health care varies across geographical regions, and which areas experience the lowest levels of service use. This study aimed to provide new population-level evidence on the geographic variation in the use of Medicare-subsidised psychotherapy over the past decade and identify regions with the lowest service use. Methods We used administrative data from the Medicare Benefits Schedule to identify 2.7 million adults aged 25–54 years across mainland Australian states with a new mental health treatment plan from a general practitioner between 2014 and 2023. State-level trends were examined by calculating the proportion of individuals who accessed Medicare-subsidised psychotherapy within 3 months of receiving their mental health treatment plan in each state per year. We then examined variation in the use of psychotherapy across regions in 2023 (Statistical Area Level 4), and assessed how this psychotherapy use was associated with area-level socioeconomic disadvantage. Results Between 2014 and 2023, psychotherapy use among adults with a mental health treatment plan declined substantially across all states, from approximately 60% of adults in 2014 to <50% in 2023. Psychotherapy use also varied markedly across sub-state regions (Statistical Area Level 4s) in 2023, with uptake ranging from 36% in Sydney’s Outer South West to 60% in Perth’s inner suburbs. Access was generally lower in non-metropolitan regions and in areas with higher socioeconomic disadvantage. Conclusions The results highlight the need for system supports that make psychological services more accessible, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Addressing access gaps will require coordinated efforts across general practice, service delivery and policy settings. Prioritising support and policies towards regions with the poorest access can assist with designing a more equitable mental health system.

Australian Health ReviewVol. 50(5)
Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.