Leader standard work and social sustainability: the mediating role of andon in human-centred lean systems

Purpose This study aims to examine how leader standard work (LSW) contributes to social sustainability (SS) in lean manufacturing environments. It also investigates whether the andon system (AS) transmits part of this relationship and whether job position conditions the relationship between LSW and SS. Design/methodology/approach The study uses survey data collected from 834 employees working in manufacturing organisations. The proposed model was tested using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). The analysis assessed the direct effect of LSW on SS, the mediating effect of AS and the moderating effect of job position using multigroup analysis. Findings LSW has a positive and significant effect on SS, identifying recurring leadership routines as a relevant antecedent of socially sustainable workplace conditions. AS partially mediates this relationship, supporting its role as one socio-technical pathway through which LSW can foster problem visibility, employee voice and organisational responsiveness. However, job position does not significantly moderate the relationship between LSW and SS. Research limitations/implications The study is based on cross-sectional perceptual data from manufacturing organisations. The LSW measure captures a specific employee-facing subset of its broader conceptual domain. Future research could use longitudinal designs, objective indicators and examine additional mechanisms and boundary conditions linking LSW with SS. Practical implications Managers should design LSW as a broad leadership infrastructure that makes employee support, problem response, learning and follow-up recurring and predictable. Andon should be implemented as one component of this system, ensuring that problem escalation generates timely, constructive and non-punitive responses. Social implications The findings suggest that recurring lean leadership practices, supported by responsive socio-technical mechanisms, can contribute to safer, more participative, respectful and responsive workplaces. Originality/value The principal contribution is to position and empirically examine LSW as an antecedent of employee-facing social sustainability, extending its role beyond operational discipline and process stability. The study further identifies AS as one partial socio-technical pathway through which this relationship operates. The absence of significant moderation by job position suggests that the LSW–SS relationship may extend beyond the operational frontline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-05-2026-0242
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leader standard work and social sustainability: the mediating role of andon in human-centred lean systems

Emilio Jiménez Macías, Alfonso J. Gil, Jorge Luis García-Alcaráz
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Quality and Supply Management
article

Leader standard work and social sustainability: the mediating role of andon in human-centred lean systems

Emilio Jiménez Macías, Alfonso J. Gil, Jorge Luis García-Alcaráz
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how leader standard work (LSW) contributes to social sustainability (SS) in lean manufacturing environments. It also investigates whether the andon system (AS) transmits part of this relationship and whether job position conditions the relationship between LSW and SS. Design/methodology/approach The study uses survey data collected from 834 employees working in manufacturing organisations. The proposed model was tested using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). The analysis assessed the direct effect of LSW on SS, the mediating effect of AS and the moderating effect of job position using multigroup analysis. Findings LSW has a positive and significant effect on SS, identifying recurring leadership routines as a relevant antecedent of socially sustainable workplace conditions. AS partially mediates this relationship, supporting its role as one socio-technical pathway through which LSW can foster problem visibility, employee voice and organisational responsiveness. However, job position does not significantly moderate the relationship between LSW and SS. Research limitations/implications The study is based on cross-sectional perceptual data from manufacturing organisations. The LSW measure captures a specific employee-facing subset of its broader conceptual domain. Future research could use longitudinal designs, objective indicators and examine additional mechanisms and boundary conditions linking LSW with SS. Practical implications Managers should design LSW as a broad leadership infrastructure that makes employee support, problem response, learning and follow-up recurring and predictable. Andon should be implemented as one component of this system, ensuring that problem escalation generates timely, constructive and non-punitive responses. Social implications The findings suggest that recurring lean leadership practices, supported by responsive socio-technical mechanisms, can contribute to safer, more participative, respectful and responsive workplaces. Originality/value The principal contribution is to position and empirically examine LSW as an antecedent of employee-facing social sustainability, extending its role beyond operational discipline and process stability. The study further identifies AS as one partial socio-technical pathway through which this relationship operates. The absence of significant moderation by job position suggests that the LSW–SS relationship may extend beyond the operational frontline.

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez (MX), Universidad de La Rioja (ES), Universidad Internacional De La Rioja (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Quality and Supply Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.