Determinants of failure of midazolam monotherapy during continuous deep sedation until death: evidence from a French cohort in a palliative care unit

Abstract Background Continuous deep sedation until death (CDSUD) is a legally regulated practice in France relying primarily on midazolam as first-line therapy. However, additional sedative agents are frequently required, and determinants of failure of midazolam monotherapy remain poorly understood. This study aimed to identify factors associated with failure of midazolam monotherapy during CDSUD, defined as the need for second- or third-line sedative agents. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-centre observational study including all patients undergoing CDSUD in a university hospital palliative care unit between 2020 and 2024. Demographic, clinical, pharmacological, and organisational data were collected. Associations with failure of midazolam monotherapy were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Age was modelled using restricted cubic splines to account for non-linear effects. Results Among 1,376 patients admitted to the unit, 287 underwent CDSUD with midazolam as first-line treatment. Median age was 69 years (IQR 59–77), and 52.3% were male. Cancer was the main diagnosis (74.2%). Failure of midazolam monotherapy occurred in 211/287 patients (73.5%). Among these patients, escalation consisted of chlorpromazine alone in 134/211 patients (63.5%), propofol alone in 20/211 patients (9.5%), and both agents in 57/211 patients (27%). In multivariable analysis, polypharmacy was independently associated with an increased risk of failure of midazolam monotherapy ( P= .002), both in patients receiving 5–9 medications (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.60–5.91) and in those receiving ≥ 10 medications (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.22–8.11). Sedation performed in the context of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment was also associated with failure of midazolam monotherapy (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.46–9.88). Age showed a significant non-linear association with outcome ( P <.001). Oxygen therapy within the 24 h preceding sedation induction was associated with a reduced risk of failure (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18–0.65). Conclusions Failure of midazolam monotherapy during CDSUD is common and associated with polypharmacy, and specific clinical contexts. The non-linear effect of age highlights complex pharmacological responses at end of life. These findings support individualized sedation strategies and early anticipation of combination therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05282-0
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of failure of midazolam monotherapy during continuous deep sedation until death: evidence from a French cohort in a palliative care unit

Simon Prampart-Fauvet, Sandrine Coudol, Adrien Evin, Jean‐François Huon et al.
BMC Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Determinants of failure of midazolam monotherapy during continuous deep sedation until death: evidence from a French cohort in a palliative care unit

Simon Prampart-Fauvet, Sandrine Coudol, Adrien Evin, Jean‐François Huon, Olivia Nguyen, Pauline Gesson, Clémence Houizot
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Continuous deep sedation until death (CDSUD) is a legally regulated practice in France relying primarily on midazolam as first-line therapy. However, additional sedative agents are frequently required, and determinants of failure of midazolam monotherapy remain poorly understood. This study aimed to identify factors associated with failure of midazolam monotherapy during CDSUD, defined as the need for second- or third-line sedative agents. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-centre observational study including all patients undergoing CDSUD in a university hospital palliative care unit between 2020 and 2024. Demographic, clinical, pharmacological, and organisational data were collected. Associations with failure of midazolam monotherapy were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Age was modelled using restricted cubic splines to account for non-linear effects. Results Among 1,376 patients admitted to the unit, 287 underwent CDSUD with midazolam as first-line treatment. Median age was 69 years (IQR 59–77), and 52.3% were male. Cancer was the main diagnosis (74.2%). Failure of midazolam monotherapy occurred in 211/287 patients (73.5%). Among these patients, escalation consisted of chlorpromazine alone in 134/211 patients (63.5%), propofol alone in 20/211 patients (9.5%), and both agents in 57/211 patients (27%). In multivariable analysis, polypharmacy was independently associated with an increased risk of failure of midazolam monotherapy ( P= .002), both in patients receiving 5–9 medications (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.60–5.91) and in those receiving ≥ 10 medications (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.22–8.11). Sedation performed in the context of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment was also associated with failure of midazolam monotherapy (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.46–9.88). Age showed a significant non-linear association with outcome ( P <.001). Oxygen therapy within the 24 h preceding sedation induction was associated with a reduced risk of failure (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18–0.65). Conclusions Failure of midazolam monotherapy during CDSUD is common and associated with polypharmacy, and specific clinical contexts. The non-linear effect of age highlights complex pharmacological responses at end of life. These findings support individualized sedation strategies and early anticipation of combination therapy.

BMC Medicine
Inserm (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR), Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes (FR), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), Université de Montréal (CA), Nantes Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.