Effectiveness and Safety of Pharmacological Treatments for Chronic Inducible Urticaria: A Narrative Synthesis

Background: Several treatments for chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) have been studied, but reviews covering all subtypes are limited. Objectives: Our goal is to synthesize the effectiveness and safety of available therapies across all CIndU subtypes. Methods: We performed a review of PubMed and Scopus databases to identify studies reporting treatment data on cold urticaria, symptomatic dermographism, solar urticaria, delayed-pressure urticaria, exercise-induced urticaria, cholinergic urticaria and mixed subtypes. No studies were identified that specifically focused on heat, aquagenic, or contact urticaria; however, these subtypes are encompassed within certain studies examining mixed subtypes. Results: Our search yielded 36 studies. Second-generation H1-antihistamines as first-line treatment provided significant symptom control in most CIndU subtypes, with updosing to four times the standard dose showing greater effectiveness than standard doses. Omalizumab was highly effective as second-line treatment for antihistamine-refractory patients, although relapse after discontinuation was common. In delayed-pressure urticaria dapsone and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin yielded good responses. Narrowband UVB benefited symptomatic dermographism and solar urticaria but with high relapse rates. Emerging mast cell-depleting therapies (barzolvolimab, lirentelimab) showed promising effectiveness, while the interleukin-1 inhibitor rilonacept failed to demonstrate clinical benefit. Across the 36 studies, adverse events were generally low for most treatments, with higher incidence reported with barzolvolimab. Conclusions: Updosed antihistamines are more effective than standard doses in controlling CIndU symptoms without a significant increase in adverse events. Omalizumab at 150–300 mg every 4 weeks is effective for antihistamine-refractory CIndU, though it is off-label. Relapse after treatment cessation is frequent, highlighting the need for personalized long-term strategies. Novel endotype-specific treatments require dedicated CIndU trials, as current evidence is largely extrapolated from chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15197685
Primary Topic
Urticaria and Related Conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and Safety of Pharmacological Treatments for Chronic Inducible Urticaria: A Narrative Synthesis

Ioannis‐Alexios Koumprentziotis, Stamatios Gregoriou, Michael P. Makris, Dimitrios Rigopoulos et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Urticaria and Related Conditions
article

Effectiveness and Safety of Pharmacological Treatments for Chronic Inducible Urticaria: A Narrative Synthesis

Ioannis‐Alexios Koumprentziotis, Stamatios Gregoriou, Michael P. Makris, Dimitrios Rigopoulos, Aikaterini Tsiogka, E Tsiogka, Alexandros I. Stratigos, Eleni Chatzidimitriou
article en

Abstract

Background: Several treatments for chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) have been studied, but reviews covering all subtypes are limited. Objectives: Our goal is to synthesize the effectiveness and safety of available therapies across all CIndU subtypes. Methods: We performed a review of PubMed and Scopus databases to identify studies reporting treatment data on cold urticaria, symptomatic dermographism, solar urticaria, delayed-pressure urticaria, exercise-induced urticaria, cholinergic urticaria and mixed subtypes. No studies were identified that specifically focused on heat, aquagenic, or contact urticaria; however, these subtypes are encompassed within certain studies examining mixed subtypes. Results: Our search yielded 36 studies. Second-generation H1-antihistamines as first-line treatment provided significant symptom control in most CIndU subtypes, with updosing to four times the standard dose showing greater effectiveness than standard doses. Omalizumab was highly effective as second-line treatment for antihistamine-refractory patients, although relapse after discontinuation was common. In delayed-pressure urticaria dapsone and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin yielded good responses. Narrowband UVB benefited symptomatic dermographism and solar urticaria but with high relapse rates. Emerging mast cell-depleting therapies (barzolvolimab, lirentelimab) showed promising effectiveness, while the interleukin-1 inhibitor rilonacept failed to demonstrate clinical benefit. Across the 36 studies, adverse events were generally low for most treatments, with higher incidence reported with barzolvolimab. Conclusions: Updosed antihistamines are more effective than standard doses in controlling CIndU symptoms without a significant increase in adverse events. Omalizumab at 150–300 mg every 4 weeks is effective for antihistamine-refractory CIndU, though it is off-label. Relapse after treatment cessation is frequent, highlighting the need for personalized long-term strategies. Novel endotype-specific treatments require dedicated CIndU trials, as current evidence is largely extrapolated from chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(19)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Hygeia Hospital (GR), Andreas Sygros Hospital (GR), University General Hospital Attikon (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Urticaria and Related Conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.