Repair in the Circular Economy: From Fragmented Practices to Strategic Repair Capability

ABSTRACT Repair is central to the circular economy, yet research remains fragmented across product design, consumer behaviour, business models, community initiatives and policy, limiting understanding of how these dimensions interact to enable repair at scale. This study systematically reviews 79 peer‐reviewed articles using bibliometric mapping, qualitative content analysis and actor‐network analysis. Three interconnected knowledge domains emerge: user and community practices; product design, manufacturing and business models; and policy and governance. Findings show that repair outcomes depend on the alignment of organisational capabilities, ecosystem actors, infrastructure and institutional conditions, while several potentially important actors remain underexplored. Integrating these findings, we conceptualise repair as an ecosystem‐dependent strategic capability for value retention and develop a framework explaining its enabling conditions and interdependencies. The study highlights implications for firms seeking to integrate repair into circular strategies and for policymakers designing supportive repair systems, while identifying research priorities on capability development, ecosystem governance, policy effectiveness and inclusive repair systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71689
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repair in the Circular Economy: From Fragmented Practices to Strategic Repair Capability

Nadine Leder, Azar MahmoumGonbadi, Jin Chan
Business Strategy and the Environment
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Repair in the Circular Economy: From Fragmented Practices to Strategic Repair Capability

Nadine Leder, Azar MahmoumGonbadi, Jin Chan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Repair is central to the circular economy, yet research remains fragmented across product design, consumer behaviour, business models, community initiatives and policy, limiting understanding of how these dimensions interact to enable repair at scale. This study systematically reviews 79 peer‐reviewed articles using bibliometric mapping, qualitative content analysis and actor‐network analysis. Three interconnected knowledge domains emerge: user and community practices; product design, manufacturing and business models; and policy and governance. Findings show that repair outcomes depend on the alignment of organisational capabilities, ecosystem actors, infrastructure and institutional conditions, while several potentially important actors remain underexplored. Integrating these findings, we conceptualise repair as an ecosystem‐dependent strategic capability for value retention and develop a framework explaining its enabling conditions and interdependencies. The study highlights implications for firms seeking to integrate repair into circular strategies and for policymakers designing supportive repair systems, while identifying research priorities on capability development, ecosystem governance, policy effectiveness and inclusive repair systems.

Business Strategy and the Environment
University of Greenwich (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
University of Greenwich, Leverhulme Trust, British Academy
Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.