Defining the rural generalist psychologist: the development and validation of a model of rural psychology practice in Australia

Objective The current study aimed to refine and validate a novel model of rural psychology practice in Australia to better support and develop the rural psychology workforce. A secondary aim was to explore participants’ perspectives of the need and utility of the proposed model in practice.Method A two-round Delphi survey was conducted, via Qualtrics, with Australian psychologists experienced in rural practice. A total of 28 participants completed Round 1 and 22 participants participated in Round 2. Reflexive content analysis was used to explore Round 1 participants’ textual responses related to model utility.Results Consensus was reached after two rounds, resulting in a validated model of rural psychology practice containing nine domains of competence. An overarching domain of The Rural Context was foundational to the remaining eight domains: Clinical Skills, Networking, Cultural Responsiveness, Practitioner Wellbeing, Ethics, Risk, Professional Development and Digital Adaptations. Participants endorsed the need for a model and provided various uses for implementation.Conclusions The current study provides an empirically validated model of rural psychology practice. Utility and clinical implications are discussed, and the model aims to improve mental health service development for rural Australians. International implications are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Psychology
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2026.2739969
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining the rural generalist psychologist: the development and validation of a model of rural psychology practice in Australia

Kim J. Usher, Adam J. Rock, Kylie Rice, Natasha M. Loi et al.
Australian Journal of Psychology
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Defining the rural generalist psychologist: the development and validation of a model of rural psychology practice in Australia

Kim J. Usher, Adam J. Rock, Kylie Rice, Natasha M. Loi, Margot P. Moody
article en

Abstract

Objective The current study aimed to refine and validate a novel model of rural psychology practice in Australia to better support and develop the rural psychology workforce. A secondary aim was to explore participants’ perspectives of the need and utility of the proposed model in practice.Method A two-round Delphi survey was conducted, via Qualtrics, with Australian psychologists experienced in rural practice. A total of 28 participants completed Round 1 and 22 participants participated in Round 2. Reflexive content analysis was used to explore Round 1 participants’ textual responses related to model utility.Results Consensus was reached after two rounds, resulting in a validated model of rural psychology practice containing nine domains of competence. An overarching domain of The Rural Context was foundational to the remaining eight domains: Clinical Skills, Networking, Cultural Responsiveness, Practitioner Wellbeing, Ethics, Risk, Professional Development and Digital Adaptations. Participants endorsed the need for a model and provided various uses for implementation.Conclusions The current study provides an empirically validated model of rural psychology practice. Utility and clinical implications are discussed, and the model aims to improve mental health service development for rural Australians. International implications are discussed.

Australian Journal of PsychologyVol. 78(1)
University of New England (US), University of New England (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.