Delayed diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in out-of-hours primary care: insights from a case-control study

Adequate triage of acute chest discomfort in out-of-hours services in primary care (OHS-PC) is crucial for minimising delays in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and subsequently limit myocardial damage. The objective was to identify predictors of delayed ACS diagnosis in OHS-PC and examine differences between females and males to further improve telephone triage of acute chest discomfort. This is a retrospective unmatched case-control study which analysed telephone triage conversations of individuals with acute chest discomfort due to ACS who contacted the OHS-PC in the Netherlands. Call characteristics, symptoms, and patient characteristics were compared between cases- those with a delayed ACS diagnosis during the initial diagnostic phase at the OHS-PC- and controls, who were adequately triaged. Additionally, sex differences were examined. Delay was defined as low urgency allocation (U3-U5) or high urgency allocation (U1 or U2) without immediate hospital referral. Of 2,428 callers with acute chest discomfort, 267 (11.0%) had an ACS, of whom 35 (13.3%) were classified as cases and 229 (86.7%) as controls. Cases were more common during daytime (42.9% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.002) and had a longer median call duration compared to controls (08:21 [07:07–13:27] min vs. 05:37 [03:53 − 07:35] min, p < 0.001). Cases less often contacted the OHS-PC within 12 h of pain onset (71.0% vs. 86.9%, p = 0.031). Patient characteristics were largely similar between cases and controls, but cases less often reported oppressive or heavy-feeling chest pain (64.3% vs. 84.3%, p = 0.011) and more often stabbing chest pain (21.4% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.025) and palpitations and/or tingling sensations (28.6% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.028). No significant differences were observed between female and male cases. Delays in ACS diagnosis were more prevalent during daytime and were associated with a longer median call duration. Patients with ACS and a delayed diagnosis less often contacted the OHS-PC within 12 h of pain onset, more often reported stabbing than oppressive or heavy-feeling chest pain, and more often reported palpitations and/or tingling sensations than patients with ACS without a delayed diagnosis. No differences were observed between female and male cases. We could not identify easily modifiable determinants of delay in the triage and referral of ACS at the OHS-PC among patients calling with acute chest discomfort. NL7134.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Family Practice
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03568-z
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delayed diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in out-of-hours primary care: insights from a case-control study

Michelle Spek, Lara S. F. Konijnenberg, Frans Hendrik Rutten, Anna S. M. Dobbe et al.
BMC Family Practice
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Delayed diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in out-of-hours primary care: insights from a case-control study

Michelle Spek, Lara S. F. Konijnenberg, Frans Hendrik Rutten, Anna S. M. Dobbe, Hester M. den Ruijter, Dorien L. M. Zwart, Mathé Delissen
article en

Abstract

Adequate triage of acute chest discomfort in out-of-hours services in primary care (OHS-PC) is crucial for minimising delays in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and subsequently limit myocardial damage. The objective was to identify predictors of delayed ACS diagnosis in OHS-PC and examine differences between females and males to further improve telephone triage of acute chest discomfort. This is a retrospective unmatched case-control study which analysed telephone triage conversations of individuals with acute chest discomfort due to ACS who contacted the OHS-PC in the Netherlands. Call characteristics, symptoms, and patient characteristics were compared between cases- those with a delayed ACS diagnosis during the initial diagnostic phase at the OHS-PC- and controls, who were adequately triaged. Additionally, sex differences were examined. Delay was defined as low urgency allocation (U3-U5) or high urgency allocation (U1 or U2) without immediate hospital referral. Of 2,428 callers with acute chest discomfort, 267 (11.0%) had an ACS, of whom 35 (13.3%) were classified as cases and 229 (86.7%) as controls. Cases were more common during daytime (42.9% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.002) and had a longer median call duration compared to controls (08:21 [07:07–13:27] min vs. 05:37 [03:53 − 07:35] min, p < 0.001). Cases less often contacted the OHS-PC within 12 h of pain onset (71.0% vs. 86.9%, p = 0.031). Patient characteristics were largely similar between cases and controls, but cases less often reported oppressive or heavy-feeling chest pain (64.3% vs. 84.3%, p = 0.011) and more often stabbing chest pain (21.4% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.025) and palpitations and/or tingling sensations (28.6% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.028). No significant differences were observed between female and male cases. Delays in ACS diagnosis were more prevalent during daytime and were associated with a longer median call duration. Patients with ACS and a delayed diagnosis less often contacted the OHS-PC within 12 h of pain onset, more often reported stabbing than oppressive or heavy-feeling chest pain, and more often reported palpitations and/or tingling sensations than patients with ACS without a delayed diagnosis. No differences were observed between female and male cases. We could not identify easily modifiable determinants of delay in the triage and referral of ACS at the OHS-PC among patients calling with acute chest discomfort. NL7134.

BMC Family Practice
Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.