Physics-guided feature-enhanced machine learning for asphalt-pavement rutting prediction and SHAP-guided structural screening
Accurate asphalt-pavement rutting prediction is central to performance-oriented design, but mechanistic-empirical models may not capture section-specific responses, while data-driven models offer limited physical interpretability. This study proposes a physics-guided feature-enhanced framework that incorporates the output of a low-fidelity mechanistic-empirical model as an engineered feature alongside layer-specific pavement variables. Long-term observations from 19 RIOHTrack sections spanning seven structural types were evaluated using pavement-section-based five-fold grouped cross-validation. PHY-XGBoost achieved the best performance (R² = 0.9391, RMSE = 4.6189 mm, MAE = 3.5680 mm, and MAPE = 6.9411%), reducing RMSE by 53.26% compared with the baseline XGBoost model. SHAP analysis identified the mechanistic-empirical feature, cumulative traffic loading, temperature, and third-layer dynamic modulus as the four most influential features; together, they accounted for 93.0% of total mean absolute SHAP importance. In an illustrative case, screening a bounded library of RIOHTrack-observed parameter templates reduced predicted rutting depth from 89.20 mm to 71.08 mm under a modulus-adjustment scheme and to 56.87 mm under a separate thickness-position scheme. The framework integrates section-level prediction, interpretable feature analysis, and transparent screening of reference pavement configurations.
Authors
- Huijie Lv
- Anxin Meng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6986-7102)
- Yingxin Hui (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3567-8212)
- Jiapeng Bai
Institutions
- Ningxia University (CN)
- Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen (China) (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Pavement Engineering
- Published
- 2026-10-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2026.2740077
- Primary Topic
- Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00