Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Slavonic Studies: Student Reflections

Artificial intelligence literacy is usually assessed through self-report scales. Such instruments show where a group stands, but not how its members reason about the technology in their own terms. Research on this topic has also concentrated on science and technology disciplines and on high-resource languages. It remains unclear how students working in low-resource languages, such as the Slavonic languages, articulate their artificial intelligence literacy, and what knowledge underlies their evaluative judgments. This study analyses written reflections and a background questionnaire from students of Slavonic studies, translation and language teaching who completed a one-semester course in artificial intelligence literacy. The reflections were produced after students used a generative artificial intelligence tool as both the commissioner and the collaborator of an individual academic project. They were examined through qualitative content analysis combining deductive and inductive categories. The findings show that the reflections centre overwhelmingly on evaluating outputs, while declarative knowledge of how such systems function remains a knowledge of symptoms rather than of mechanisms. Evaluative judgments depend heavily on disciplinary expertise in areas such as phonetics, lexicology, translation and language pedagogy, rather than on general critical thinking, and target precisely the errors a domain-uninformed reader would not detect. The questionnaire further shows that students already held a critical disposition toward artificial intelligence before the course began, which constrains how the reflective practice documented here can be interpreted. Taken together, the results reposition disciplinary expertise, more than technical understanding of artificial intelligence, as the primary resource for critical evaluation, with direct implications for teaching artificial intelligence literacy and language technology in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology and language
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2026.03.13
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Slavonic Studies: Student Reflections

Monika Řičicová, Pavel Pilch, Tereza Poledníková
Technology and language
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Slavonic Studies: Student Reflections

Monika Řičicová, Pavel Pilch, Tereza Poledníková
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence literacy is usually assessed through self-report scales. Such instruments show where a group stands, but not how its members reason about the technology in their own terms. Research on this topic has also concentrated on science and technology disciplines and on high-resource languages. It remains unclear how students working in low-resource languages, such as the Slavonic languages, articulate their artificial intelligence literacy, and what knowledge underlies their evaluative judgments. This study analyses written reflections and a background questionnaire from students of Slavonic studies, translation and language teaching who completed a one-semester course in artificial intelligence literacy. The reflections were produced after students used a generative artificial intelligence tool as both the commissioner and the collaborator of an individual academic project. They were examined through qualitative content analysis combining deductive and inductive categories. The findings show that the reflections centre overwhelmingly on evaluating outputs, while declarative knowledge of how such systems function remains a knowledge of symptoms rather than of mechanisms. Evaluative judgments depend heavily on disciplinary expertise in areas such as phonetics, lexicology, translation and language pedagogy, rather than on general critical thinking, and target precisely the errors a domain-uninformed reader would not detect. The questionnaire further shows that students already held a critical disposition toward artificial intelligence before the course began, which constrains how the reflective practice documented here can be interpreted. Taken together, the results reposition disciplinary expertise, more than technical understanding of artificial intelligence, as the primary resource for critical evaluation, with direct implications for teaching artificial intelligence literacy and language technology in higher education.

Technology and language
Masaryk University (CZ)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.