Experimental evolution of female mating responses to infertile males in Tribolium castaneum

Abstract In many animal populations, infertile males—those unable to reproduce—are commonly present. If females mate exclusively with such males, they fail to produce offspring. How, then, do females deal with this situation? Distinguishing infertile from fertile males both before and after copulation is difficult for females. Here, we tested the hypothesis of bet-hedging polyandry, in which females mitigate the risk of reproductive failure by mating with multiple males, using experimental evolution in the red flour beetle ( Tribolium castaneum ). Females were cohabited with males artificially sterilized by sublethal radiation and with untreated males at a 1:1 ratio (sterile:untreated). After more than 15 generations, females from the treatment strains did not avoid mating with infertile males, leading to reduced reproductive success. However, compared with the control strains, females from the treated strains tended to mate with a greater number of males. The results raise the possibility that increased polyandry (mating with multiple males) may evolve rather than relying on pre- or post-copulatory discrimination to mitigate the risk posed by infertile males. Bet-hedging is a strategy that spreads or minimizes risk under uncertainty, and these results are consistent with the hypothesis that polyandry can function as a bet-hedging strategy against uncertain male fertility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ethology
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-026-00902-x
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental evolution of female mating responses to infertile males in Tribolium castaneum

健太 こおり, Chihiro Himuro, Yoshitaka Sokei, Yukio Yasui et al.
Journal of Ethology
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
article

Experimental evolution of female mating responses to infertile males in Tribolium castaneum

健太 こおり, Chihiro Himuro, Yoshitaka Sokei, Yukio Yasui, Yutaka Nakamoto, Kentarou Matsumura, Takahisa Miyatake, Yui Fujii, Yui Asano
article en

Abstract

Abstract In many animal populations, infertile males—those unable to reproduce—are commonly present. If females mate exclusively with such males, they fail to produce offspring. How, then, do females deal with this situation? Distinguishing infertile from fertile males both before and after copulation is difficult for females. Here, we tested the hypothesis of bet-hedging polyandry, in which females mitigate the risk of reproductive failure by mating with multiple males, using experimental evolution in the red flour beetle ( Tribolium castaneum ). Females were cohabited with males artificially sterilized by sublethal radiation and with untreated males at a 1:1 ratio (sterile:untreated). After more than 15 generations, females from the treatment strains did not avoid mating with infertile males, leading to reduced reproductive success. However, compared with the control strains, females from the treated strains tended to mate with a greater number of males. The results raise the possibility that increased polyandry (mating with multiple males) may evolve rather than relying on pre- or post-copulatory discrimination to mitigate the risk posed by infertile males. Bet-hedging is a strategy that spreads or minimizes risk under uncertainty, and these results are consistent with the hypothesis that polyandry can function as a bet-hedging strategy against uncertain male fertility.

Journal of Ethology
Okayama Shoka University (JP), Kagawa University (JP), Gifu University (JP), Okinawa Prefectural Plant Protection Center (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.