Investigating the thermal degradation of multi-board decking materials ignited by firebrand piles

Background Firebrand piles are a major contributor to structural losses during wildland–urban interface fires. Among potential recipient fuels, decking materials exhibit ignition susceptibility that is strongly dependent on material type. However, experiments on representative multi-board decking specimens exposed to deposited firebrand piles remain limited. Aims This study quantifies the thermal degradation of multi-board decking specimens ignited by firebrand piles under various conditions. Methods Experiments were conducted on 60 × 60 cm2 multi-board decking, testing two materials: pressure-treated wood (PTW) and wood–polymer composite (WPC). The applied conditions included different wind speeds, material moisture contents (MC) and firebrand pile orientations. Experiments extended beyond firebrand pile consumption. Key results WPC showed low sensitivity to firebrand pile exposure across all conditions. Conversely, PTW exhibited high susceptibility to firebrand pile ignition, with increasing wind speed significantly elevating thermal degradation and burn-through, while being necessary for back-surface flaming. Reducing MC played a secondary role, whereas pile orientation showed the least influence. Conclusions PTW was substantially more susceptible to firebrand pile ignition than WPC, with thermal degradation strongly governed by the applied conditions. Implications Experiments on representative multi-board decking specimens are essential to evaluate scale effects and assess the applicability of small-scale observations to larger decking assemblies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wf25316
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the thermal degradation of multi-board decking materials ignited by firebrand piles

Mohamed E. Mohamed, Alexander I. Filkov, Trent D. Penman, Gavin P. Horn et al.
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Fire dynamics and safety research
article

Investigating the thermal degradation of multi-board decking materials ignited by firebrand piles

Mohamed E. Mohamed, Alexander I. Filkov, Trent D. Penman, Gavin P. Horn, Stanislav I. Stoliarov
article en

Abstract

Background Firebrand piles are a major contributor to structural losses during wildland–urban interface fires. Among potential recipient fuels, decking materials exhibit ignition susceptibility that is strongly dependent on material type. However, experiments on representative multi-board decking specimens exposed to deposited firebrand piles remain limited. Aims This study quantifies the thermal degradation of multi-board decking specimens ignited by firebrand piles under various conditions. Methods Experiments were conducted on 60 × 60 cm2 multi-board decking, testing two materials: pressure-treated wood (PTW) and wood–polymer composite (WPC). The applied conditions included different wind speeds, material moisture contents (MC) and firebrand pile orientations. Experiments extended beyond firebrand pile consumption. Key results WPC showed low sensitivity to firebrand pile exposure across all conditions. Conversely, PTW exhibited high susceptibility to firebrand pile ignition, with increasing wind speed significantly elevating thermal degradation and burn-through, while being necessary for back-surface flaming. Reducing MC played a secondary role, whereas pile orientation showed the least influence. Conclusions PTW was substantially more susceptible to firebrand pile ignition than WPC, with thermal degradation strongly governed by the applied conditions. Implications Experiments on representative multi-board decking specimens are essential to evaluate scale effects and assess the applicability of small-scale observations to larger decking assemblies.

International Journal of Wildland FireVol. 35(10)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), UL Research Institutes (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Underwriters Laboratories
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Fire dynamics and safety research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.