Sapiens in Control: A Six-Dimension Framework for Evaluating Control Failures in Advanced AI Agents

Sapiens in Control, formerly Human in Control, is the same independent public-interest research initiative and working-paper series. This paper proposes the Human Control Model: Intervention Durability, Technical Containment, Informed Delegation, Oversight Integrity, Control Contagion, and Situational Grounding. Version 1.3 changes the project and paper name while retaining the six dimensions, five pilot cases, qualitative severity definitions, prior versions, and concept DOI lineage. It adds analysis of OpenAI's September 28 safety-case guidance, Anthropic's September 24 Project Swap experiment, and Agent Incident Registry research. New proposals distinguish preference accuracy from authorization and connect control claims to bounded evidence. These sources are not additional uncontrolled deployment incidents. This is an unreviewed conceptual working paper, not an independently validated framework. Earlier versions retain the Human in Control title. Revision notes explain the transition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23132853
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sapiens in Control: A Six-Dimension Framework for Evaluating Control Failures in Advanced AI Agents

Sapiens in Control Project
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Sapiens in Control: A Six-Dimension Framework for Evaluating Control Failures in Advanced AI Agents

Sapiens in Control Project
article en

Abstract

Sapiens in Control, formerly Human in Control, is the same independent public-interest research initiative and working-paper series. This paper proposes the Human Control Model: Intervention Durability, Technical Containment, Informed Delegation, Oversight Integrity, Control Contagion, and Situational Grounding. Version 1.3 changes the project and paper name while retaining the six dimensions, five pilot cases, qualitative severity definitions, prior versions, and concept DOI lineage. It adds analysis of OpenAI's September 28 safety-case guidance, Anthropic's September 24 Project Swap experiment, and Agent Incident Registry research. New proposals distinguish preference accuracy from authorization and connect control claims to bounded evidence. These sources are not additional uncontrolled deployment incidents. This is an unreviewed conceptual working paper, not an independently validated framework. Earlier versions retain the Human in Control title. Revision notes explain the transition.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.