Understanding Cancer Information Burden and Quality Concerns: The Roles of Medical Statistics Literacy, Online Health Information Confidence, and Social Media

Understanding factors shaping perceptions of cancer-related information is important for public health communication. This study examined associations of three information-related predictors, understanding medical statistics, confidence in online health information, and difficulty interpreting social media information, with two outcomes: cancer information was too hard to understand (CTU) and concern about cancer information quality (CCQ). Data came from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. The cross-sectional study included 1972 participants. Survey-weighted univariable and multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between the three predictors and CTU and CCQ, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, health insurance, and cancer history. LASSO logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and support vector models were implemented to assess prediction performances for the outcomes. SHAP and variable importance plots identified influential predictors. Difficulty understanding medical statistics was associated with higher odds of agreeing CTU (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.17-3.05) and agreeing CCQ (AOR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.11-2.57). Lower confidence in finding helpful health information online was associated with higher odds of both outcomes, whereas complete confidence was associated with lower odds relative to very confident. Greater difficulty interpreting social media information was associated with CTU (AOR = 2.92, 95% CI: 1.66-5.14) and CCQ (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.07-3.33). SHAP and variable importance identified difficulty understanding medical statistics, confidence in online health information, and difficulty interpreting health information on social media as key predictors. These findings emphasize public health communication strategies prioritizing statistical literacy, clearer cancer information, and improved evaluation of online and social media health content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Education
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-026-02989-9
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Cancer Information Burden and Quality Concerns: The Roles of Medical Statistics Literacy, Online Health Information Confidence, and Social Media

Aditya Chakraborty, Sikta Das, Amy Myat Phyo
Journal of Cancer Education
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Understanding Cancer Information Burden and Quality Concerns: The Roles of Medical Statistics Literacy, Online Health Information Confidence, and Social Media

Aditya Chakraborty, Sikta Das, Amy Myat Phyo
article en

Abstract

Understanding factors shaping perceptions of cancer-related information is important for public health communication. This study examined associations of three information-related predictors, understanding medical statistics, confidence in online health information, and difficulty interpreting social media information, with two outcomes: cancer information was too hard to understand (CTU) and concern about cancer information quality (CCQ). Data came from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. The cross-sectional study included 1972 participants. Survey-weighted univariable and multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between the three predictors and CTU and CCQ, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, health insurance, and cancer history. LASSO logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and support vector models were implemented to assess prediction performances for the outcomes. SHAP and variable importance plots identified influential predictors. Difficulty understanding medical statistics was associated with higher odds of agreeing CTU (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.17-3.05) and agreeing CCQ (AOR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.11-2.57). Lower confidence in finding helpful health information online was associated with higher odds of both outcomes, whereas complete confidence was associated with lower odds relative to very confident. Greater difficulty interpreting social media information was associated with CTU (AOR = 2.92, 95% CI: 1.66-5.14) and CCQ (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.07-3.33). SHAP and variable importance identified difficulty understanding medical statistics, confidence in online health information, and difficulty interpreting health information on social media as key predictors. These findings emphasize public health communication strategies prioritizing statistical literacy, clearer cancer information, and improved evaluation of online and social media health content.

Journal of Cancer Education
University of Central Florida (US), University of South Florida (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.