Institutional availability, training resources, and supervised participation in robot-assisted surgery among Polish urology residents: a nationwide survey

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has expanded rapidly in Poland, but its integration into resident education remains uncertain. In a nationwide anonymous 35-question survey sent to 390 Polish urology residents, 156 completed it (40.0%). Among respondents, 110 (70.5%) reported RAS availability in their training centre; 56 (35.9%) reported robotic training access, 43 (27.6%) a robotic course, 46 (29.5%) simulator availability, 76 (48.7%) assistant participation, and 16 (10.3%) a supervised robotic procedure or procedural step. All respondents with training access were in RAS centres. Among these 110 respondents, course attendance (aOR 5.38, 95% CI 2.05–14.14) and simulator availability (aOR 3.90, 95% CI 1.54–9.89) were associated with access. Training access was associated with assistant participation (aOR 6.66, 95% CI 3.06–14.50), higher current and expected self-rated skill (common aORs 12.30 and 12.15), and at least satisfactory training satisfaction (aOR 17.01, 95% CI 6.35–45.57). All 16 such reports occurred among residents with access; in an exploratory conditional Firth model, each additional residency year was associated with this outcome (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.30–3.97). Items were independent, not sequential stages. Institutional adoption exceeded reported training access and supervised participation. Broad survey content makes participation driven solely by robotics interest less likely, but the 40.0% completion proportion, self-report, unmeasured trainee selection, and rare supervised outcome limit inference.