Stress reduces loss aversion without increasing reward-cue attentional salience

Abstract Attentional and evaluative decision biases both shape motivated behavior, yet their interplay under acute stress remains unclear. We tested whether acute psychosocial stress affects loss aversion and reward-cue attentional salience. Sixty-one healthy adults completed the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (stress vs. control, between-subjects design), a mixed-gambling task to estimate loss aversion (λ) while conditioning cue-outcome associations, and a visual search task probing attentional salience of the conditioned cues, with concurrent autonomic and endocrine recording. Participants in the stress condition showed reduced loss aversion, attenuating the typical overweighting of losses relative to gains. By contrast, reward-associated cues reliably biased visual search, but this attentional capture did not differ by condition. Manipulation checks indicated heterogeneous physiological reactivity, which limits strong inferences about the null attentional effect. Overall, the findings are consistent with stress-related changes in evaluative weighting emerging more readily than changes in cue-driven attention under the present protocol. They further suggest that reductions in loss aversion do not necessarily require a measurable increase in reward-cue salience. Implications for understanding stress-related risky behaviors and the persistence of maladaptive cue-driven responses are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Motivation and Emotion
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-026-10286-7
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress reduces loss aversion without increasing reward-cue attentional salience

Stefania Coelli, Rossana Actis-Grosso, Pierluigi Reali, Anna Maria Bianchi et al.
Motivation and Emotion
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Stress reduces loss aversion without increasing reward-cue attentional salience

Stefania Coelli, Rossana Actis-Grosso, Pierluigi Reali, Anna Maria Bianchi, Matteo De Tommaso
article en

Abstract

Abstract Attentional and evaluative decision biases both shape motivated behavior, yet their interplay under acute stress remains unclear. We tested whether acute psychosocial stress affects loss aversion and reward-cue attentional salience. Sixty-one healthy adults completed the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (stress vs. control, between-subjects design), a mixed-gambling task to estimate loss aversion (λ) while conditioning cue-outcome associations, and a visual search task probing attentional salience of the conditioned cues, with concurrent autonomic and endocrine recording. Participants in the stress condition showed reduced loss aversion, attenuating the typical overweighting of losses relative to gains. By contrast, reward-associated cues reliably biased visual search, but this attentional capture did not differ by condition. Manipulation checks indicated heterogeneous physiological reactivity, which limits strong inferences about the null attentional effect. Overall, the findings are consistent with stress-related changes in evaluative weighting emerging more readily than changes in cue-driven attention under the present protocol. They further suggest that reductions in loss aversion do not necessarily require a measurable increase in reward-cue salience. Implications for understanding stress-related risky behaviors and the persistence of maladaptive cue-driven responses are discussed.

Motivation and Emotion
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
European Commission, NextGenerationEU
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stress reduces loss aversion without increasing reward-cue attentional salience — Stefania Coelli, Rossana Actis-Grosso, et al. · Motivation and Emotion (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS