The potential for academic and research institutions to support the Kunming‐Montréal global biodiversity framework

Abstract The implementation of the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) emphasizes a “whole‐of‐government and whole‐of‐society” approach to achieving ambitious goals and targets to conserve and sustainably use biodiversity. The Conference of the Parties to the CBD invites academic and research institutions to support the implementation of the KMGBF and has recently established regional Technical and Scientific Cooperation Centers to assist Parties in accessing academic advice. Yet, it remains to be determined to what extent and in what ways academic and research institutions can support the KMGBF, and how such support can be coordinated with the actions of the regional centers. Through a network analysis of the actors involved in the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans of 52 African countries, we assessed the expected contributions of academic institutions as knowledge providers and facilitators. Governments expect academics to play a key role in the national implementation of global biodiversity policies. Our analysis suggests that the roles of regional support centers and academic and research institutions are complementary in supporting the implementation of the KMGBF. As such, academic institutions can play a foundational role in creating structured mechanisms for both knowledge production and knowledge brokerage. Next to this study presenting our analysis and findings in academic style, we also provide decision makers and CBD Parties a two‐page Policy Brief summarizing the paper and its implications for practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70433
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The potential for academic and research institutions to support the Kunming‐Montréal global biodiversity framework

Philip McGowan, Eleanor Jane Milner‐Gulland, Mohammad Khalid Sayeed Pasha, Colin M. Beale et al.
3 links
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

The potential for academic and research institutions to support the Kunming‐Montréal global biodiversity framework

Philip McGowan, Eleanor Jane Milner‐Gulland, Mohammad Khalid Sayeed Pasha, Colin M. Beale, Élie Pédarros, Onyeka Nwosu, Hannah Nicholas, George Holmes, Philip A. Stephens, Robert J. Brown, Mark Shirley, Ashley Dias, Erie Tamale, Arvin Diesmos
article en

Abstract

Abstract The implementation of the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) emphasizes a “whole‐of‐government and whole‐of‐society” approach to achieving ambitious goals and targets to conserve and sustainably use biodiversity. The Conference of the Parties to the CBD invites academic and research institutions to support the implementation of the KMGBF and has recently established regional Technical and Scientific Cooperation Centers to assist Parties in accessing academic advice. Yet, it remains to be determined to what extent and in what ways academic and research institutions can support the KMGBF, and how such support can be coordinated with the actions of the regional centers. Through a network analysis of the actors involved in the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans of 52 African countries, we assessed the expected contributions of academic institutions as knowledge providers and facilitators. Governments expect academics to play a key role in the national implementation of global biodiversity policies. Our analysis suggests that the roles of regional support centers and academic and research institutions are complementary in supporting the implementation of the KMGBF. As such, academic institutions can play a foundational role in creating structured mechanisms for both knowledge production and knowledge brokerage. Next to this study presenting our analysis and findings in academic style, we also provide decision makers and CBD Parties a two‐page Policy Brief summarizing the paper and its implications for practice.

Conservation Science and Practice
University of Leeds (GB), Durham University (GB), UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office (TH), Science Oxford (GB), Ministry of Health (SC), University of Seychelles (SC), National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NG), University of York (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon