Revisiting Permanent Establishment: The 2025 OECD Commentary Update on Homeworking

Cross-border homeworking has become a lasting feature of modern employment. This development has renewed attention in the interpretation of Article 5(1) of the OECD Model Convention (MC) and the circumstances in which a home office may constitute a permanent establishment (PE). The ‘fixed place of business’ test was traditionally closely linked to physical presence and disposal, and home offices were rarely treated as creating a PE, particularly when work was performed out of personal convenience. The OECD amended the Commentary to Article 5(1) in November 2025 when it introduced a 50% time indicator and a ‘commercial reasons’ criterion that was intended to clarify when cross-border homeworking may create a taxable presence. This article assesses this Commentary update. It is argued that the 2025 update shifts the analysis from a control-based disposal test to a more functional assessment based on economic justification even though the Model text remains unchanged. Introducing a time threshold and a ‘commercial reasons’ filter reshape the fixed-place analysis and its interaction with Article 5(4). This enhances administrability, however, several questions remain open, and determining a PE remains a fact-intensive assessment grounded in the treaty and bilateral context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Intertax
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2026077
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Permanent Establishment: The 2025 OECD Commentary Update on Homeworking

Aikaterini Pantazatou
Intertax
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

Revisiting Permanent Establishment: The 2025 OECD Commentary Update on Homeworking

Aikaterini Pantazatou
article en

Abstract

Cross-border homeworking has become a lasting feature of modern employment. This development has renewed attention in the interpretation of Article 5(1) of the OECD Model Convention (MC) and the circumstances in which a home office may constitute a permanent establishment (PE). The ‘fixed place of business’ test was traditionally closely linked to physical presence and disposal, and home offices were rarely treated as creating a PE, particularly when work was performed out of personal convenience. The OECD amended the Commentary to Article 5(1) in November 2025 when it introduced a 50% time indicator and a ‘commercial reasons’ criterion that was intended to clarify when cross-border homeworking may create a taxable presence. This article assesses this Commentary update. It is argued that the 2025 update shifts the analysis from a control-based disposal test to a more functional assessment based on economic justification even though the Model text remains unchanged. Introducing a time threshold and a ‘commercial reasons’ filter reshape the fixed-place analysis and its interaction with Article 5(4). This enhances administrability, however, several questions remain open, and determining a PE remains a fact-intensive assessment grounded in the treaty and bilateral context.

IntertaxVol. 54(Issue 11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon