Minimal Geodesics under Finite Covers

A minimal closed geodesic need not have a simple projection under a finite Riemannian cover. We give explicit flat double covers and primitive minimal geodesics whose primitive projections have exactly m double points, for every positive integer m. Both manifolds can be chosen orientable in every dimension at least three. These examples disprove the simple-projection clause of Theorem 2.5 in Contreras and Mazzucchelli's Closed geodesics and the first Betti number (DOI 10.1112/plms.70085). The obstruction is that a deck isometry need not preserve the minimizing cohomology class. We also prove a sufficient repair: if that class is pulled back from the base, the projected geodesic is minimal and its primitive traversal is simple. The authors' non-cover perturbation theorem then applies on the base. The general entropy-density question AIM 8.4.1 is not resolved, and the truth of the cited general Corollary 2.6 is not decided. This English preprint is AI-assisted, self-audited and unrefereed; novelty remains undetermined. No independent human review, formal verification or absolute-priority claim is made.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23112889
Primary Topic
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Minimal Geodesics under Finite Covers

Alper Ferudun
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
preprint

Minimal Geodesics under Finite Covers

Alper Ferudun
preprint en

Abstract

A minimal closed geodesic need not have a simple projection under a finite Riemannian cover. We give explicit flat double covers and primitive minimal geodesics whose primitive projections have exactly m double points, for every positive integer m. Both manifolds can be chosen orientable in every dimension at least three. These examples disprove the simple-projection clause of Theorem 2.5 in Contreras and Mazzucchelli's Closed geodesics and the first Betti number (DOI 10.1112/plms.70085). The obstruction is that a deck isometry need not preserve the minimizing cohomology class. We also prove a sufficient repair: if that class is pulled back from the base, the projected geodesic is minimal and its primitive traversal is simple. The authors' non-cover perturbation theorem then applies on the base. The general entropy-density question AIM 8.4.1 is not resolved, and the truth of the cited general Corollary 2.6 is not decided. This English preprint is AI-assisted, self-audited and unrefereed; novelty remains undetermined. No independent human review, formal verification or absolute-priority claim is made.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.