Intercell nonuniformity and dominant mechanisms analysis in industrial-scale water electrolyzer stacks: a unified comparative multiphysics modeling across AWE, AEM and PEM

Low temperature water electrolysis is a key route for converting renewable electricity into green hydrogen, but industrial-scale stacks are prone to intercell nonuniformity during scale up. The origins and dominant mechanisms of this nonuniformity remain unclear across different electrolyzer technologies. To address this issue, this study develops a unified stack-scale multiphysics lumped-parameter model for industrial-scale alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEM), and proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEM) stacks and uses it to compare the dominant mechanisms of intercell nonuniformity across the three technologies. The model is formulated on a common stack-level basis and couples flow distribution, shunt current, bubble coverage, temperature distribution, and electrochemical reaction under a common external flow network. The common stack-level framework is first validated using an AWE experimental platform. The model results show that AWE exhibits the strongest intercell nonuniformity, mainly due to shunt current induced redistribution of effective reaction current. AEM shows intermediate behavior governed by weak shunt current and gas-phase effects, whereas PEM is influenced mainly by bubble coverage and temperature development. Load dependent and layered physical field analyses further reveal that AWE is dominated by shunt current, causing a 12.38% rated current loss and a 7.21% energy-efficiency drop, whereas the responses of AEM and PEM are governed mainly by voltage efficiency degradation, driven by gas-phase and temperature effects. The proposed framework provides a unified basis for mechanism identification and differentiated optimization of industrial-scale low temperature electrolyzer stacks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.128884
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intercell nonuniformity and dominant mechanisms analysis in industrial-scale water electrolyzer stacks: a unified comparative multiphysics modeling across AWE, AEM and PEM

Xiaomeng Ai, Xiaobo Yang, Weichi Zhang, Shichang Cui et al.
Applied Energy
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
article

Intercell nonuniformity and dominant mechanisms analysis in industrial-scale water electrolyzer stacks: a unified comparative multiphysics modeling across AWE, AEM and PEM

Xiaomeng Ai, Xiaobo Yang, Weichi Zhang, Shichang Cui, Danji Huang, Tianyu Hu, Qunlei Wen, Wenxin Liu, Ang Lu, Jiakun Fang, Jinyu Wen, Hao Li
article en

Abstract

Low temperature water electrolysis is a key route for converting renewable electricity into green hydrogen, but industrial-scale stacks are prone to intercell nonuniformity during scale up. The origins and dominant mechanisms of this nonuniformity remain unclear across different electrolyzer technologies. To address this issue, this study develops a unified stack-scale multiphysics lumped-parameter model for industrial-scale alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEM), and proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEM) stacks and uses it to compare the dominant mechanisms of intercell nonuniformity across the three technologies. The model is formulated on a common stack-level basis and couples flow distribution, shunt current, bubble coverage, temperature distribution, and electrochemical reaction under a common external flow network. The common stack-level framework is first validated using an AWE experimental platform. The model results show that AWE exhibits the strongest intercell nonuniformity, mainly due to shunt current induced redistribution of effective reaction current. AEM shows intermediate behavior governed by weak shunt current and gas-phase effects, whereas PEM is influenced mainly by bubble coverage and temperature development. Load dependent and layered physical field analyses further reveal that AWE is dominated by shunt current, causing a 12.38% rated current loss and a 7.21% energy-efficiency drop, whereas the responses of AEM and PEM are governed mainly by voltage efficiency degradation, driven by gas-phase and temperature effects. The proposed framework provides a unified basis for mechanism identification and differentiated optimization of industrial-scale low temperature electrolyzer stacks.

Applied EnergyVol. 427
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN), Hitachi (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.