Between neutrality and controversy: preservice teachers’ political dispositions and views on teaching controversial issues

Discussions of controversial social and political issues are central to democratic education and citizenship. Although prior research has examined how teachers address such issues, less is known about how preservice teachers’ political dispositions and demographic characteristics relate to their civic and citizenship education beliefs. We surveyed preservice teachers in Germany and used multiple linear regression to predict endorsement of four principles: prohibition against indoctrination, creating controversy, presenting controversial issues as controversial, and teacher neutrality. Knowledge of national guidelines was positively associated with indoctrination prohibition and both controversy-oriented principles, but unrelated to teacher neutrality. Liberal policy demands and political alienation were positively associated with creating controversy, while liberal policy demands negatively and political alienation positively predicted support for teacher neutrality. Female preservice teachers were more likely to endorse teacher neutrality, and those with a migration background less likely to support presenting issues as controversial. The findings identify starting points for teacher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teachers and Teaching
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2026.2742264
Primary Topic
Global Education and Multiculturalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between neutrality and controversy: preservice teachers’ political dispositions and views on teaching controversial issues

Thorsten Fahrbach, Axinja Hachfeld
Teachers and Teaching
Global Education and Multiculturalism
article

Between neutrality and controversy: preservice teachers’ political dispositions and views on teaching controversial issues

Thorsten Fahrbach, Axinja Hachfeld
article en

Abstract

Discussions of controversial social and political issues are central to democratic education and citizenship. Although prior research has examined how teachers address such issues, less is known about how preservice teachers’ political dispositions and demographic characteristics relate to their civic and citizenship education beliefs. We surveyed preservice teachers in Germany and used multiple linear regression to predict endorsement of four principles: prohibition against indoctrination, creating controversy, presenting controversial issues as controversial, and teacher neutrality. Knowledge of national guidelines was positively associated with indoctrination prohibition and both controversy-oriented principles, but unrelated to teacher neutrality. Liberal policy demands and political alienation were positively associated with creating controversy, while liberal policy demands negatively and political alienation positively predicted support for teacher neutrality. Female preservice teachers were more likely to endorse teacher neutrality, and those with a migration background less likely to support presenting issues as controversial. The findings identify starting points for teacher education.

Teachers and Teaching
University of Bonn (DE), University of Passau (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Education and Multiculturalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between neutrality and controversy: preservice teachers’ political dispositions and views on teaching controversial issues — Thorsten Fahrbach, Axinja Hachfeld · Teachers and Teaching (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS