Real-World First-Line Treatment Characteristics and Physician Drivers in Advanced/Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and without Actionable Genomic Alterations

For patients with advanced/metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) without actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) and with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50%, first-line (1L) treatment options include immunotherapy (IO) monotherapy or IO with chemotherapy. However, real-world data describing treatment patterns, physician decision-making, and patient-reported disease burden remain limited. This observational, cross-sectional study used data from the Adelphi Real World Lung Cancer Disease Specific Programme™, conducted between December 2023 and May 2024 in Asia, Europe, and the USA. Physicians completed surveys on adults with aNSCLC, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and no AGAs, who received or were receiving 1L therapy. Treatment patterns, physician-reported reasons for treatment selection, symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were descriptively analyzed by 1L regimen (IO monotherapy, IO + chemotherapy). Overall, 257 physicians reported data for 511 patients; 148 patients completed PRO questionnaires. Most patients received 1L IO monotherapy ( n = 340, 67%), while 23% received IO + chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was the most frequently prescribed regimen across regions. Physicians most commonly cited overall survival and response-related benefits as reasons for 1L treatment selection; quality of life was less frequently prioritized. Both physician- and patient-reported symptoms were common at data collection, including fatigue, cough, and dyspnea. Nearly half of patients required caregiver support. Health-related quality of life, assessed using EQ-5D-5L and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) instruments, indicated that among patients treated for more than 90 days, substantial disease burden was present across 1L treatment groups. In real-world clinical practice, two-thirds of patients with aNSCLC, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and no AGAs received 1L IO monotherapy, driven primarily by perceived survival benefits on part of physicians. Considerable symptom burden, functional impairment, and caregiver dependence were observed across the 1L treatment groups evaluated. These findings highlight ongoing unmet needs and underscore the importance of incorporating patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life considerations into 1L treatment decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology and Therapy
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40487-026-00465-4
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World First-Line Treatment Characteristics and Physician Drivers in Advanced/Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and without Actionable Genomic Alterations

Martin Sebastian, Shilpa Viswanathan, Shivani K. Mhatre, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu et al.
Oncology and Therapy
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Real-World First-Line Treatment Characteristics and Physician Drivers in Advanced/Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and without Actionable Genomic Alterations

Martin Sebastian, Shilpa Viswanathan, Shivani K. Mhatre, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu, Hollie M. L. Bailey, Cosmina S. Hogea, Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu, Cameron Forshaw, Dwight Hall Owen, Inderjit K Dhillon, Siwen Ding
article en

Abstract

For patients with advanced/metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) without actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) and with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50%, first-line (1L) treatment options include immunotherapy (IO) monotherapy or IO with chemotherapy. However, real-world data describing treatment patterns, physician decision-making, and patient-reported disease burden remain limited. This observational, cross-sectional study used data from the Adelphi Real World Lung Cancer Disease Specific Programme™, conducted between December 2023 and May 2024 in Asia, Europe, and the USA. Physicians completed surveys on adults with aNSCLC, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and no AGAs, who received or were receiving 1L therapy. Treatment patterns, physician-reported reasons for treatment selection, symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were descriptively analyzed by 1L regimen (IO monotherapy, IO + chemotherapy). Overall, 257 physicians reported data for 511 patients; 148 patients completed PRO questionnaires. Most patients received 1L IO monotherapy ( n = 340, 67%), while 23% received IO + chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was the most frequently prescribed regimen across regions. Physicians most commonly cited overall survival and response-related benefits as reasons for 1L treatment selection; quality of life was less frequently prioritized. Both physician- and patient-reported symptoms were common at data collection, including fatigue, cough, and dyspnea. Nearly half of patients required caregiver support. Health-related quality of life, assessed using EQ-5D-5L and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) instruments, indicated that among patients treated for more than 90 days, substantial disease burden was present across 1L treatment groups. In real-world clinical practice, two-thirds of patients with aNSCLC, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and no AGAs received 1L IO monotherapy, driven primarily by perceived survival benefits on part of physicians. Considerable symptom burden, functional impairment, and caregiver dependence were observed across the 1L treatment groups evaluated. These findings highlight ongoing unmet needs and underscore the importance of incorporating patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life considerations into 1L treatment decision-making.

Oncology and Therapy
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria (ES), The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US), Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP), Adelphi Group (United Kingdom) (GB), Gilead Sciences (United Kingdom) (GB), Gilead Sciences (United States) (US), Frankfurt Cancer Institute (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.