Recommendations for the Development and Implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Pediatric Clinical Care: Policy Statement

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into pediatric health care offers exciting opportunities alongside critical challenges. GenAI tools, like large language models (LLMs), show promise in several health care applications, including but not limited to clinical decision support, documentation, and medical education across a wide range of pediatric subspecialties. However, real-world validation remains limited, and concerns persist around accuracy, bias, reliability, sustainability, and durability. Studies indicate that LLMs, when applied to pediatrics, often underperform compared with adult medical specialties, raising questions about their readiness for use in the care of children and adolescents. Moreover, the risk of exacerbating health disparities among patients of various races, ethnicities, genders, languages, abilities, and socioeconomic statuses because of biased or nonrepresentative training data underscores the need for rigorous oversight and accountability. This policy outlines recommendations for the safe, equitable, and effective use of GenAI in pediatric settings. Developers should prioritize diverse pediatric data sets, proactively address bias, and implement strong data privacy and security safeguards. Health care institutions must establish rigorous validation protocols, ensure compliance with privacy regulations, and maintain clear human oversight. Relevant regulatory and oversight bodies should enforce pediatric-specific evaluations and require postmarket surveillance. Governance frameworks must support interdisciplinary collaboration, transparency, and education initiatives to equip pediatricians with GenAI literacy. Reasonable disclosure of GenAI involvement in patient care is essential to establish and strengthen trust. GenAI policies pertaining to the care of children and adolescents must remain adaptive to ensure ethical, equitable, and evidence-based implementation. Despite these numerous challenges, GenAI holds transformative potential to improve pediatric health outcomes, and this policy seeks to empower developers, researchers, and clinicians to responsibly build and harness this technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PEDIATRICS
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2026-079037
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommendations for the Development and Implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Pediatric Clinical Care: Policy Statement

Srinivasan Suresh, Juan D. Chaparro, Juan Espinoza, Eli M. Lourie et al.
PEDIATRICS
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Recommendations for the Development and Implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Pediatric Clinical Care: Policy Statement

Srinivasan Suresh, Juan D. Chaparro, Juan Espinoza, Eli M. Lourie, Brandan P. Kennedy, Melissa S. Van Cain, Marvin B. Harper, Lindsay A. Stevens, Christina Jung, Lauren M. Hess, Amy Molten, Kevin R. Dufendach, Ryan Brandon Hunter, Vasum Peiris, Alyssa M. Abo, Karen M. Kaplan, Kathryn Kilpatrick Cheek, Sonja S. Short, Gwenyth Anne Fischer, Rachel Goldstein, Janene Hilary Fuerch, Barbara Periard, Section on Innovation in Therapeutics and Technology, Naveed J. Rabbani
article en

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into pediatric health care offers exciting opportunities alongside critical challenges. GenAI tools, like large language models (LLMs), show promise in several health care applications, including but not limited to clinical decision support, documentation, and medical education across a wide range of pediatric subspecialties. However, real-world validation remains limited, and concerns persist around accuracy, bias, reliability, sustainability, and durability. Studies indicate that LLMs, when applied to pediatrics, often underperform compared with adult medical specialties, raising questions about their readiness for use in the care of children and adolescents. Moreover, the risk of exacerbating health disparities among patients of various races, ethnicities, genders, languages, abilities, and socioeconomic statuses because of biased or nonrepresentative training data underscores the need for rigorous oversight and accountability. This policy outlines recommendations for the safe, equitable, and effective use of GenAI in pediatric settings. Developers should prioritize diverse pediatric data sets, proactively address bias, and implement strong data privacy and security safeguards. Health care institutions must establish rigorous validation protocols, ensure compliance with privacy regulations, and maintain clear human oversight. Relevant regulatory and oversight bodies should enforce pediatric-specific evaluations and require postmarket surveillance. Governance frameworks must support interdisciplinary collaboration, transparency, and education initiatives to equip pediatricians with GenAI literacy. Reasonable disclosure of GenAI involvement in patient care is essential to establish and strengthen trust. GenAI policies pertaining to the care of children and adolescents must remain adaptive to ensure ethical, equitable, and evidence-based implementation. Despite these numerous challenges, GenAI holds transformative potential to improve pediatric health outcomes, and this policy seeks to empower developers, researchers, and clinicians to responsibly build and harness this technology.

PEDIATRICS
Grand Rapids Community College (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (US), Texas Children's Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.