Stimulating gender-diverse teams’ creativity through team diversity training: A field experiment

Abstract Evidence of the gender diversity–team creativity relationship is inconsistent, highlighting the importance of managing the underlying processes. Building on the two predominant perspectives on team diversity processes, social categorization and information/decision-making, we propose that diversity training is most conducive to gender-diverse teams’ creativity when it stimulates information elaboration in addition to strengthening team identification. In a randomized field experiment with 446 individuals nested within 57 intact organizational teams, we examined the effectiveness of two team diversity training designs versus no training in enhancing the creativity of gender-diverse teams. One training focused solely on the social perspective (identification-focused), while the other addressed both the social and informational perspectives (identification-and-elaboration-focused). We tested the interactive effects of the two training conditions (vs. no training) and gender diversity on team creativity using pre- and post-measures. The findings provide partial support for our model. Identification-focused training did not stimulate the creativity of gender-diverse teams, and neither training condition affected team identification. Relative to no training, identification-and-elaboration-focused training was positively linked to team creativity via improved information elaboration among highly gender-diverse teams. The contrast between the two active training conditions was however not significant, and the evidence for the information-elaboration pathway should be interpreted cautiously. These findings provide initial field experimental evidence that team diversity training targeting information elaboration can help highly gender-diverse teams use their informational resources for creativity, contributing to the literature on managing (gender-)diverse teams. They further underscore the need for replication and testing the effectiveness of specific training components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business and Psychology
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-026-10155-7
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stimulating gender-diverse teams’ creativity through team diversity training: A field experiment

Christoph Reinert, Bart Voorn, Claudia Buengeler, Astrid Carlotta Homan
Journal of Business and Psychology
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Stimulating gender-diverse teams’ creativity through team diversity training: A field experiment

Christoph Reinert, Bart Voorn, Claudia Buengeler, Astrid Carlotta Homan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Evidence of the gender diversity–team creativity relationship is inconsistent, highlighting the importance of managing the underlying processes. Building on the two predominant perspectives on team diversity processes, social categorization and information/decision-making, we propose that diversity training is most conducive to gender-diverse teams’ creativity when it stimulates information elaboration in addition to strengthening team identification. In a randomized field experiment with 446 individuals nested within 57 intact organizational teams, we examined the effectiveness of two team diversity training designs versus no training in enhancing the creativity of gender-diverse teams. One training focused solely on the social perspective (identification-focused), while the other addressed both the social and informational perspectives (identification-and-elaboration-focused). We tested the interactive effects of the two training conditions (vs. no training) and gender diversity on team creativity using pre- and post-measures. The findings provide partial support for our model. Identification-focused training did not stimulate the creativity of gender-diverse teams, and neither training condition affected team identification. Relative to no training, identification-and-elaboration-focused training was positively linked to team creativity via improved information elaboration among highly gender-diverse teams. The contrast between the two active training conditions was however not significant, and the evidence for the information-elaboration pathway should be interpreted cautiously. These findings provide initial field experimental evidence that team diversity training targeting information elaboration can help highly gender-diverse teams use their informational resources for creativity, contributing to the literature on managing (gender-)diverse teams. They further underscore the need for replication and testing the effectiveness of specific training components.

Journal of Business and Psychology
Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Kiel (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), C Care Orthopedics (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.